Total
397 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2013-4508 | 3 Debian, Lighttpd, Opensuse | 3 Debian Linux, Lighttpd, Opensuse | 2025-04-11 | 7.5 High |
lighttpd before 1.4.34, when SNI is enabled, configures weak SSL ciphers, which makes it easier for remote attackers to hijack sessions by inserting packets into the client-server data stream or obtain sensitive information by sniffing the network. | ||||
CVE-2013-2566 | 4 Canonical, Fujitsu, Mozilla and 1 more | 24 Ubuntu Linux, M10-1, M10-1 Firmware and 21 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
The RC4 algorithm, as used in the TLS protocol and SSL protocol, has many single-byte biases, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct plaintext-recovery attacks via statistical analysis of ciphertext in a large number of sessions that use the same plaintext. | ||||
CVE-2013-0764 | 4 Canonical, Mozilla, Opensuse and 1 more | 9 Ubuntu Linux, Firefox, Seamonkey and 6 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
The nsSOCKSSocketInfo::ConnectToProxy function in Mozilla Firefox before 18.0, Firefox ESR 17.x before 17.0.2, Thunderbird before 17.0.2, Thunderbird ESR 17.x before 17.0.2, and SeaMonkey before 2.15 does not ensure thread safety for SSL sessions, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via crafted data, as demonstrated by e-mail message data. | ||||
CVE-2024-28860 | 1 Cilium | 1 Cilium | 2025-04-10 | 8 High |
Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based dataplane. Users of IPsec transparent encryption in Cilium may be vulnerable to cryptographic attacks that render the transparent encryption ineffective. In particular, Cilium is vulnerable to chosen plaintext, key recovery, replay attacks by a man-in-the-middle attacker. These attacks are possible due to an ESP sequence number collision when multiple nodes are configured with the same key. Fixed versions of Cilium use unique keys for each IPsec tunnel established between nodes, resolving all of the above attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.13.13, 1.14.9, and 1.15.3. | ||||
CVE-2021-40341 | 1 Hitachienergy | 2 Foxman-un, Unem | 2025-04-10 | 7.1 High |
DES cipher, which has inadequate encryption strength, is used Hitachi Energy FOXMAN-UN to encrypt user credentials used to access the Network Elements. Successful exploitation allows sensitive information to be decrypted easily. This issue affects * FOXMAN-UN product: FOXMAN-UN R16A, FOXMAN-UN R15B, FOXMAN-UN R15A, FOXMAN-UN R14B, FOXMAN-UN R14A, FOXMAN-UN R11B, FOXMAN-UN R11A, FOXMAN-UN R10C, FOXMAN-UN R9C; * UNEM product: UNEM R16A, UNEM R15B, UNEM R15A, UNEM R14B, UNEM R14A, UNEM R11B, UNEM R11A, UNEM R10C, UNEM R9C. List of CPEs: * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R16A:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R15B:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R15A:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R14B:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R14A:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R11B:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R11A:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R10C:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:foxman-un:R9C:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R16A:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R15B:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R15A:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R14B:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R14A:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R11B:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R11A:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R10C:*:*:*:*:*:*:* * cpe:2.3:a:hitachienergy:unem:R9C:*:*:*:*:*:*:* | ||||
CVE-2009-2474 | 5 Apple, Canonical, Fedoraproject and 2 more | 5 Mac Os X, Ubuntu Linux, Fedora and 2 more | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
neon before 0.28.6, when OpenSSL or GnuTLS is used, does not properly handle a '\0' character in a domain name in the subject's Common Name (CN) field of an X.509 certificate, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof arbitrary SSL servers via a crafted certificate issued by a legitimate Certification Authority, a related issue to CVE-2009-2408. | ||||
CVE-2004-2172 | 1 Netsourcecommerce | 1 Productcart | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 High |
EarlyImpact ProductCart uses a weak encryption scheme to encrypt passwords, which allows remote attackers to obtain the password via a chosen plaintext attack. | ||||
CVE-2001-1546 | 1 Mckesson | 1 Pathways Homecare | 2025-04-03 | 7.8 High |
Pathways Homecare 6.5 uses weak encryption for user names and passwords, which allows local users to gain privileges by recovering the passwords from the pwhc.ini file. | ||||
CVE-2002-1910 | 1 Click-2 | 1 Ingenium Learning Management System | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 High |
Click2Learn Ingenium Learning Management System 5.1 and 6.1 uses weak encryption for passwords (reversible algorithm), which allows attackers to obtain passwords. | ||||
CVE-2002-1946 | 1 Tata | 1 Integrated Dialer | 2025-04-03 | 5.5 Medium |
Videsh Sanchar Nigam Limited (VSNL) Integrated Dialer Software 1.2.000, when the "Save Password" option is used, stores the password with a weak encryption scheme (one-to-one mapping) in a registry key, which allows local users to obtain and decrypt the password. | ||||
CVE-2002-1697 | 1 Vtun Project | 1 Vtun | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 High |
Electronic Code Book (ECB) mode in VTun 2.0 through 2.5 uses a weak encryption algorithm that produces the same ciphertext from the same plaintext blocks, which could allow remote attackers to gain sensitive information. | ||||
CVE-2002-1872 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Sql Server | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 High |
Microsoft SQL Server 6.0 through 2000, with SQL Authentication enabled, uses weak password encryption (XOR), which allows remote attackers to sniff and decrypt the password. | ||||
CVE-2005-2281 | 1 Juvare | 1 Webeoc | 2025-04-03 | 7.5 High |
WebEOC before 6.0.2 uses a weak encryption scheme for passwords, which makes it easier for attackers to crack passwords. | ||||
CVE-2005-0366 | 1 Gnupg | 1 Gnupg | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
The integrity check feature in OpenPGP, when handling a message that was encrypted using cipher feedback (CFB) mode, allows remote attackers to recover part of the plaintext via a chosen-ciphertext attack when the first 2 bytes of a message block are known, and an oracle or other mechanism is available to determine whether an integrity check failed. | ||||
CVE-2002-1682 | 1 Daansystems | 1 Newsreactor | 2025-04-03 | 5.5 Medium |
NewsReactor 1.0 uses a weak encryption scheme, which could allow local users to decrypt the passwords and gain access to other users' newsgroup accounts. | ||||
CVE-2002-1739 | 1 Mdaemon | 1 Mdaemon | 2025-04-03 | 5.5 Medium |
Alt-N Technologies Mdaemon 5.0 through 5.0.6 uses a weak encryption algorithm to store user passwords, which allows local users to crack passwords. | ||||
CVE-2002-1975 | 1 Sharp | 4 Zaurus Sl-5000d, Zaurus Sl-5000d Firmware, Zaurus Sl-5500 and 1 more | 2025-04-03 | 5.5 Medium |
Sharp Zaurus PDA SL-5000D and SL-5500 uses a salt of "A0" to encrypt the screen-locking password as stored in the Security.conf file, which makes it easier for local users to guess the password via brute force methods. | ||||
CVE-2025-2516 | 2025-03-27 | N/A | ||
The use of a weak cryptographic key pair in the signature verification process in WPS Office (Kingsoft) on Windows allows an attacker who successfully recovered the private key to sign components. As older versions of WPS Office did not validate the update server's certificate, an Adversary-In-The-Middle attack was possible allowing updates to be hijacked. | ||||
CVE-2022-43922 | 2 Ibm, Redhat | 2 App Connect Enterprise Certified Container, Openshift | 2025-03-26 | 5.3 Medium |
IBM App Connect Enterprise Certified Container 4.1, 4.2, 5.0, 5.1, 5.2, 6.0, 6.1, and 6.2 could disclose sensitive information to an attacker due to a weak hash of an API Key in the configuration. IBM X-Force ID: 241583. | ||||
CVE-2022-34385 | 1 Dell | 2 Supportassist For Business Pcs, Supportassist For Home Pcs | 2025-03-26 | 5.5 Medium |
SupportAssist for Home PCs (version 3.11.4 and prior) and SupportAssist for Business PCs (version 3.2.0 and prior) contain cryptographic weakness vulnerability. An authenticated non-admin user could potentially exploit the issue and obtain sensitive information. |