Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Openshift Ai
Subscriptions
Total
20 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-11831 | 1 Redhat | 33 Acm, Advanced Cluster Security, Ansible Automation Platform and 30 more | 2025-04-10 | 5.4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in npm-serialize-javascript. The vulnerability occurs because the serialize-javascript module does not properly sanitize certain inputs, such as regex or other JavaScript object types, allowing an attacker to inject malicious code. This code could be executed when deserialized by a web browser, causing Cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks. This issue is critical in environments where serialized data is sent to web clients, potentially compromising the security of the website or web application using this package. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56171 | 1 Redhat | 11 Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services, Network Observ Optr and 8 more | 2025-03-28 | 7.8 High |
| libxml2 before 2.12.10 and 2.13.x before 2.13.6 has a use-after-free in xmlSchemaIDCFillNodeTables and xmlSchemaBubbleIDCNodeTables in xmlschemas.c. To exploit this, a crafted XML document must be validated against an XML schema with certain identity constraints, or a crafted XML schema must be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24928 | 1 Redhat | 11 Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services, Network Observ Optr and 8 more | 2025-03-21 | 7.8 High |
| libxml2 before 2.12.10 and 2.13.x before 2.13.6 has a stack-based buffer overflow in xmlSnprintfElements in valid.c. To exploit this, DTD validation must occur for an untrusted document or untrusted DTD. NOTE: this is similar to CVE-2017-9047. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3596 | 5 Broadcom, Freeradius, Ietf and 2 more | 12 Brocade Sannav, Fabric Operating System, Freeradius and 9 more | 2025-03-18 | 9 Critical |
| RADIUS Protocol under RFC 2865 is susceptible to forgery attacks by a local attacker who can modify any valid Response (Access-Accept, Access-Reject, or Access-Challenge) to any other response using a chosen-prefix collision attack against MD5 Response Authenticator signature. | ||||
| CVE-2025-24970 | 1 Redhat | 7 Apache Camel Spring Boot, Camel K, Camel Quarkus and 4 more | 2025-02-21 | 7.5 High |
| Netty, an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework, has a vulnerability starting in version 4.1.91.Final and prior to version 4.1.118.Final. When a special crafted packet is received via SslHandler it doesn't correctly handle validation of such a packet in all cases which can lead to a native crash. Version 4.1.118.Final contains a patch. As workaround its possible to either disable the usage of the native SSLEngine or change the code manually. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45338 | 1 Redhat | 23 Acm, Advanced Cluster Security, Cert Manager and 20 more | 2025-02-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| An attacker can craft an input to the Parse functions that would be processed non-linearly with respect to its length, resulting in extremely slow parsing. This could cause a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2024-56201 | 1 Redhat | 12 Ansible Automation Platform, Discovery, Enterprise Linux and 9 more | 2025-02-18 | 7.3 High |
| Jinja is an extensible templating engine. In versions on the 3.x branch prior to 3.1.5, a bug in the Jinja compiler allows an attacker that controls both the content and filename of a template to execute arbitrary Python code, regardless of if Jinja's sandbox is used. To exploit the vulnerability, an attacker needs to control both the filename and the contents of a template. Whether that is the case depends on the type of application using Jinja. This vulnerability impacts users of applications which execute untrusted templates where the template author can also choose the template filename. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.1.5. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45337 | 1 Redhat | 15 Acm, Advanced Cluster Security, Cert Manager and 12 more | 2025-02-18 | 9.1 Critical |
| Applications and libraries which misuse connection.serverAuthenticate (via callback field ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback) may be susceptible to an authorization bypass. The documentation for ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback says that "A call to this function does not guarantee that the key offered is in fact used to authenticate." Specifically, the SSH protocol allows clients to inquire about whether a public key is acceptable before proving control of the corresponding private key. PublicKeyCallback may be called with multiple keys, and the order in which the keys were provided cannot be used to infer which key the client successfully authenticated with, if any. Some applications, which store the key(s) passed to PublicKeyCallback (or derived information) and make security relevant determinations based on it once the connection is established, may make incorrect assumptions. For example, an attacker may send public keys A and B, and then authenticate with A. PublicKeyCallback would be called only twice, first with A and then with B. A vulnerable application may then make authorization decisions based on key B for which the attacker does not actually control the private key. Since this API is widely misused, as a partial mitigation golang.org/x/cry...@v0.31.0 enforces the property that, when successfully authenticating via public key, the last key passed to ServerConfig.PublicKeyCallback will be the key used to authenticate the connection. PublicKeyCallback will now be called multiple times with the same key, if necessary. Note that the client may still not control the last key passed to PublicKeyCallback if the connection is then authenticated with a different method, such as PasswordCallback, KeyboardInteractiveCallback, or NoClientAuth. Users should be using the Extensions field of the Permissions return value from the various authentication callbacks to record data associated with the authentication attempt instead of referencing external state. Once the connection is established the state corresponding to the successful authentication attempt can be retrieved via the ServerConn.Permissions field. Note that some third-party libraries misuse the Permissions type by sharing it across authentication attempts; users of third-party libraries should refer to the relevant projects for guidance. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45339 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift Ai | 2025-02-17 | 7.1 High |
| When logs are written to a widely-writable directory (the default), an unprivileged attacker may predict a privileged process's log file path and pre-create a symbolic link to a sensitive file in its place. When that privileged process runs, it will follow the planted symlink and overwrite that sensitive file. To fix that, glog now causes the program to exit (with status code 2) when it finds that the configured log file already exists. | ||||
| CVE-2025-26791 | 1 Redhat | 3 Ansible Automation Platform, Openshift Ai, Service Mesh | 2025-02-14 | 4.5 Medium |
| DOMPurify before 3.2.4 has an incorrect template literal regular expression, sometimes leading to mutation cross-site scripting (mXSS). | ||||
| CVE-2024-24786 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 23 Go, Acm, Cluster Observability Operator and 20 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.5 High |
| The protojson.Unmarshal function can enter an infinite loop when unmarshaling certain forms of invalid JSON. This condition can occur when unmarshaling into a message which contains a google.protobuf.Any value, or when the UnmarshalOptions.DiscardUnknown option is set. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10963 | 1 Redhat | 4 Enterprise Linux, Openshift, Openshift Ai and 1 more | 2025-02-13 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in pam_access, where certain rules in its configuration file are mistakenly treated as hostnames. This vulnerability allows attackers to trick the system by pretending to be a trusted hostname, gaining unauthorized access. This issue poses a risk for systems that rely on this feature to control who can access certain services or terminals. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22150 | 1 Redhat | 3 Enterprise Linux, Openshift Ai, Rhdh | 2025-02-12 | 6.8 Medium |
| Undici is an HTTP/1.1 client. Starting in version 4.5.0 and prior to versions 5.28.5, 6.21.1, and 7.2.3, undici uses `Math.random()` to choose the boundary for a multipart/form-data request. It is known that the output of `Math.random()` can be predicted if several of its generated values are known. If there is a mechanism in an app that sends multipart requests to an attacker-controlled website, they can use this to leak the necessary values. Therefore, an attacker can tamper with the requests going to the backend APIs if certain conditions are met. This is fixed in versions 5.28.5, 6.21.1, and 7.2.3. As a workaround, do not issue multipart requests to attacker controlled servers. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11187 | 1 Redhat | 8 Enterprise Linux, Openshift, Openshift Ai and 5 more | 2025-02-11 | 7.5 High |
| It is possible to construct a zone such that some queries to it will generate responses containing numerous records in the Additional section. An attacker sending many such queries can cause either the authoritative server itself or an independent resolver to use disproportionate resources processing the queries. Zones will usually need to have been deliberately crafted to attack this exposure. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.11.37, 9.16.0 through 9.16.50, 9.18.0 through 9.18.32, 9.20.0 through 9.20.4, 9.21.0 through 9.21.3, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.11.37-S1, 9.16.8-S1 through 9.16.50-S1, and 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.32-S1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-52798 | 2 Pillarjs, Redhat | 7 Path-to-regexp, Discovery, Openshift and 4 more | 2025-01-24 | 5.3 Medium |
| path-to-regexp turns path strings into a regular expressions. In certain cases, path-to-regexp will output a regular expression that can be exploited to cause poor performance. The regular expression that is vulnerable to backtracking can be generated in the 0.1.x release of path-to-regexp. Upgrade to 0.1.12. This vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2024-45296. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45296 | 2 Pillarjs, Redhat | 19 Path-to-regexp, Acm, Ansible Automation Platform and 16 more | 2025-01-24 | 7.5 High |
| path-to-regexp turns path strings into a regular expressions. In certain cases, path-to-regexp will output a regular expression that can be exploited to cause poor performance. Because JavaScript is single threaded and regex matching runs on the main thread, poor performance will block the event loop and lead to a DoS. The bad regular expression is generated any time you have two parameters within a single segment, separated by something that is not a period (.). For users of 0.1, upgrade to 0.1.10. All other users should upgrade to 8.0.0. | ||||
| CVE-2024-21538 | 2 Cross-spawn, Redhat | 11 Cross-spawn, Advanced Cluster Security, Discovery and 8 more | 2025-01-09 | 7.5 High |
| Versions of the package cross-spawn before 7.0.5 are vulnerable to Regular Expression Denial of Service (ReDoS) due to improper input sanitization. An attacker can increase the CPU usage and crash the program by crafting a very large and well crafted string. | ||||
| CVE-2024-49767 | 2 Palletsprojects, Redhat | 3 Quart, Werkzeug, Openshift Ai | 2025-01-03 | 7.5 High |
| Werkzeug is a Web Server Gateway Interface web application library. Applications using `werkzeug.formparser.MultiPartParser` corresponding to a version of Werkzeug prior to 3.0.6 to parse `multipart/form-data` requests (e.g. all flask applications) are vulnerable to a relatively simple but effective resource exhaustion (denial of service) attack. A specifically crafted form submission request can cause the parser to allocate and block 3 to 8 times the upload size in main memory. There is no upper limit; a single upload at 1 Gbit/s can exhaust 32 GB of RAM in less than 60 seconds. Werkzeug version 3.0.6 fixes this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2024-55565 | 1 Redhat | 11 Acm, Ansible Automation Platform, Discovery and 8 more | 2024-12-12 | 4.3 Medium |
| nanoid (aka Nano ID) before 5.0.9 mishandles non-integer values. 3.3.8 is also a fixed version. | ||||
| CVE-2024-7557 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift Ai, Openshift Data Science | 2024-11-25 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability was found in OpenShift AI that allows for authentication bypass and privilege escalation across models within the same namespace. When deploying AI models, the UI provides the option to protect models with authentication. However, credentials from one model can be used to access other models and APIs within the same namespace. The exposed ServiceAccount tokens, visible in the UI, can be utilized with oc --token={token} to exploit the elevated view privileges associated with the ServiceAccount, leading to unauthorized access to additional resources. | ||||
Page 1 of 1.