| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Privilege escalation from Editor to Admin using Groups in Concrete CMS versions 8.5.6 and below. If a group is granted "view" permissions on the bulkupdate page, then users in that group can escalate to being an administrator with a specially crafted curl. Fixed by adding a check for group permissions before allowing a group to be moved. Concrete CMS Security team CVSS scoring: 7.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:HCredit for discovery: "Adrian Tiron from FORTBRIDGE ( https://www.fortbridge.co.uk/ )"This fix is also in Concrete version 9.0.0 |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability was found in concrete5 < 8.5.5 that allowed a decimal notation encoded IP address to bypass the limitations in place for localhost allowing interaction with local services. Impact can vary depending on services exposed.CVSSv2.0 AV:A/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N |
| A cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in Concrete CMS <v9 that could allow an attacker to make requests on behalf of other users. |
| A CSRF in Concrete CMS version 8.5.5 and below allows an attacker to clone topics which can lead to UI inconvenience, and exhaustion of disk space.Credit for discovery: "Solar Security Research Team" |
| Unauthorized individuals could view password protected files using view_inline in Concrete CMS (previously concrete 5) prior to version 8.5.7. Concrete CMS now checks to see if a file has a password in view_inline and, if it does, the file is not rendered.For version 8.5.6, the following mitigations were put in place a. restricting file types for view_inline to images only b. putting a warning in the file manager to advise users.Credit for discovery: "Solar Security Research Team"Concrete CMS security team CVSS scoring is 5.3: AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:NThis fix is also in Concrete version 9.0.0 |
| Concrete CMS prior to 8.5.6 had a CSFR vulnerability allowing attachments to comments in the conversation section to be deleted.Credit for discovery: "Solar Security Research Team" |
| A CSRF in Concrete CMS version 8.5.5 and below allows an attacker to duplicate files which can lead to UI inconvenience, and exhaustion of disk space.Credit for discovery: "Solar Security CMS Research Team" |
| Concrete5 up to and including 8.5.2 allows Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type such as a .php file via File Manager. It is possible to modify site configuration to upload the PHP file and execute arbitrary commands. |
| Concrete5 before 8.5.3 does not constrain the sort direction to a valid asc or desc value. |
| Concrete5 before 8.5.3 allows Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type such as a .phar file. |
| Concrete5 8.4.3 has XSS because config/concrete.php allows uploads (by administrators) of SVG files that may contain HTML data with a SCRIPT element. |
| A Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in tools/files/importers/remote.php in concrete5 8.2.0 can lead to attacks on the local network and mapping of the internal network, because of URL functionality on the File Manager page. |
| An issue was discovered in tools/conversations/view_ajax.php in Concrete5 before 8.3.0. An unauthenticated user can enumerate comments from all blog posts by POSTing requests to /index.php/tools/required/conversations/view_ajax with incremental 'cnvID' integers. |
| A Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the rcID parameter in Concrete CMS 5.4.1.1 and earlier. |
| Concrete CMS versions 9.0.0 through 9.3.3 are affected by a
stored XSS vulnerability in the "Top Navigator Bar" block.
Since the "Top Navigator Bar" output was not sufficiently sanitized, a rogue administrator could add a malicious payload that could be executed when targeted users visited the home page.The Concrete CMS Security Team gave this vulnerability a CVSS v4 score of 4.6
with vector CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N https://www.first.org/cvss/calculator/4.0#CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N . This
does not affect versions below 9.0.0 since they do not have the Top
Navigator Bar Block. Thanks, Chu Quoc Khanh for reporting. |
