| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Jawn is an open source JSON parser. Extenders of the `org.typelevel.jawn.SimpleFacade` and `org.typelevel.jawn.MutableFacade` who don't override `objectContext()` are vulnerable to a hash collision attack which may result in a denial of service. Most applications do not implement these traits directly, but inherit from a library. `jawn-parser-1.3.1` fixes this issue and users are advised to upgrade. For users unable to upgrade override `objectContext()` to use a collision-safe collection. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM i800 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM i801 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM i802 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM i803 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM M2100 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM M2200 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM M969 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RMC30 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RMC8388 V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RP110 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS1600 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS1600F (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS1600T (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS400 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS401 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS416 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS416P (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS416Pv2 V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS416v2 V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RS8000 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS8000A (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS8000H (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS8000T (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900G (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RS900GP (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900L (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-C01 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900M-GETS-XX (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-C01 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900M-STND-XX (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS900W (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS910 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS910L (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS910W (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS920L (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS920W (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS930L (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS930W (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS940G (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RS969 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100 (32M) V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2100P (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2200 (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2288 V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300 V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2300P V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG2488 V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG907R (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG908C (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG909R (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG910C (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V4.X (All versions < V4.3.8), RUGGEDCOM RSG920P V5.X (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RSL910 (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RST2228 (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RST2228P (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RST916C (All versions < V5.7.0), RUGGEDCOM RST916P (All versions < V5.7.0). The SSH server on affected devices is configured to offer weak ciphers by default.
This could allow an unauthorized attacker in a man-in-the-middle position to read and modify any data passed over the connection between legitimate clients and the affected device. |
| Lack of Transport Encryption in the public API in Philips Hue Bridge BSB002 SW 1707040932 allows remote attackers to read API keys (and consequently bypass the pushlink protection mechanism, and obtain complete control of the connected accessories) by leveraging the ability to sniff HTTP traffic on the local intranet network. |
| go-jose before 1.0.4 suffers from an invalid curve attack for the ECDH-ES algorithm. When deriving a shared key using ECDH-ES for an encrypted message, go-jose neglected to check that the received public key on a message is on the same curve as the static private key of the receiver, thus making it vulnerable to an invalid curve attack. |
| IBM Security Guardium 9.0, 9.1, and 9.5 supports interaction between multiple actors and allows those actors to negotiate which algorithm should be used as a protection mechanism such as encryption or authentication, but it does not select the strongest algorithm that is available to both parties. IBM X-Force ID: 124746. |
| WordPress through 4.8.2 uses a weak MD5-based password hashing algorithm, which makes it easier for attackers to determine cleartext values by leveraging access to the hash values. NOTE: the approach to changing this may not be fully compatible with certain use cases, such as migration of a WordPress site from a web host that uses a recent PHP version to a different web host that uses PHP 5.2. These use cases are plausible (but very unlikely) based on statistics showing widespread deployment of WordPress with obsolete PHP versions. |
| A vulnerability in Trend Micro ScanMail for Exchange 12.0 exists in which some communications to the update servers are not encrypted. |
| The Mxit protocol uses weak encryption when encrypting user passwords, which might allow attackers to (1) decrypt hashed passwords by leveraging knowledge of client registration codes or (2) gain login access by eavesdropping on login messages and re-using the hashed passwords. |
| An Inadequate Encryption Strength issue was discovered in Schneider Electric Wonderware InTouch Access Anywhere, version 11.5.2 and prior. The software will connect via Transport Layer Security without verifying the peer's SSL certificate properly. |
| An issue was discovered in certain Apple products. iOS before 10.3 is affected. The issue involves the Simple Certificate Enrollment Protocol (SCEP) implementation in the "Profiles" component. It allows remote attackers to bypass cryptographic protection mechanisms by leveraging DES support. |
| An issue was discovered in certain Apple products. Pages before 6.1, Numbers before 4.1, and Keynote before 7.1 on macOS and Pages before 3.1, Numbers before 3.1, and Keynote before 3.1 on iOS are affected. The issue involves the "Export" component. It allows users to bypass iWork PDF password protection by leveraging use of 40-bit RC4. |
| Due to a lack of standard encryption when transmitting sensitive information over the internet to a centralized monitoring service, the Eview EV-07S GPS Tracker discloses personally identifying information, such as GPS data and IMEI numbers, to any man-in-the-middle (MitM) listener. |
| hitek.jar in Hitek Software's Automize uses weak encryption when encrypting SSH/SFTP and Encryption profile passwords. This allows an attacker to retrieve the encrypted passwords from sshProfiles.jsd and encryptionProfiles.jsd and decrypt them to recover cleartext passwords. All 10.x up to and including 10.25 and all 11.x up to and including 11.14 are verified to be affected. |
| Information Disclosure can occur in Hitek Software's Automize 10.x and 11.x passManager.jsd. Users have the Read attribute, which allows an attacker to recover the encrypted password to access the Password Manager. |
| PGP/MIME encrypted messages injected into a Vaultive O365 (before 4.5.21) frontend via IMAP or SMTP have their Content-Type changed from 'Content-Type: multipart/encrypted; protocol="application/pgp-encrypted"; boundary="abc123abc123"' to 'Content-Type: text/plain' - this results in the encrypted message being structured in such a way that most PGP/MIME-capable mail user agents are unable to decrypt it cleanly. The outcome is that encrypted mail passing through this device does not work (Denial of Service), and a common real-world consequence is a request to resend the mail in the clear (Information Disclosure). |
| The openssl gem for Ruby uses the same initialization vector (IV) in GCM Mode (aes-*-gcm) when the IV is set before the key, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to bypass the encryption protection mechanism. |
| In all Qualcomm products with Android releases from CAF using the Linux kernel, insecure ciphersuites were included in the default configuration. |
| An issue was discovered in sysPass 2.x before 2.1, in which an algorithm was never sufficiently reviewed by cryptographers. The fact that inc/SP/Core/Crypt.class is using the MCRYPT_RIJNDAEL_256() function (the 256-bit block version of Rijndael, not AES) instead of MCRYPT_RIJNDAEL_128 (real AES) could help an attacker to create unknown havoc in the remote system. |
| IBM BigFix Compliance Analytics 1.9.79 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. IBM X-Force ID: 123431. |
| xbcrypt in Percona XtraBackup before 2.3.6 and 2.4.x before 2.4.5 does not properly set the initialization vector (IV) for encryption, which makes it easier for context-dependent attackers to obtain sensitive information from encrypted backup files via a Chosen-Plaintext attack. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2013-6394. |
