Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Ceph Storage
Subscriptions
Total
129 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2020-13379 | 5 Fedoraproject, Grafana, Netapp and 2 more | 11 Fedora, Grafana, E-series Performance Analyzer and 8 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.2 High |
| The avatar feature in Grafana 3.0.1 through 7.0.1 has an SSRF Incorrect Access Control issue. This vulnerability allows any unauthenticated user/client to make Grafana send HTTP requests to any URL and return its result to the user/client. This can be used to gain information about the network that Grafana is running on. Furthermore, passing invalid URL objects could be used for DOS'ing Grafana via SegFault. | ||||
| CVE-2020-12458 | 3 Fedoraproject, Grafana, Redhat | 4 Fedora, Grafana, Ceph Storage and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.5 Medium |
| An information-disclosure flaw was found in Grafana through 6.7.3. The database directory /var/lib/grafana and database file /var/lib/grafana/grafana.db are world readable. This can result in exposure of sensitive information (e.g., cleartext or encrypted datasource passwords). | ||||
| CVE-2020-12059 | 3 Canonical, Linuxfoundation, Redhat | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Ceph, Ceph Storage | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| An issue was discovered in Ceph through 13.2.9. A POST request with an invalid tagging XML can crash the RGW process by triggering a NULL pointer exception. | ||||
| CVE-2020-10753 | 5 Canonical, Fedoraproject, Linuxfoundation and 2 more | 6 Ubuntu Linux, Fedora, Ceph and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the Red Hat Ceph Storage RadosGW (Ceph Object Gateway). The vulnerability is related to the injection of HTTP headers via a CORS ExposeHeader tag. The newline character in the ExposeHeader tag in the CORS configuration file generates a header injection in the response when the CORS request is made. Ceph versions 3.x and 4.x are vulnerable to this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2020-10685 | 2 Debian, Redhat | 6 Debian Linux, Ansible Engine, Ansible Tower and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Ansible Engine affecting Ansible Engine versions 2.7.x before 2.7.17 and 2.8.x before 2.8.11 and 2.9.x before 2.9.7 as well as Ansible Tower before and including versions 3.4.5 and 3.5.5 and 3.6.3 when using modules which decrypts vault files such as assemble, script, unarchive, win_copy, aws_s3 or copy modules. The temporary directory is created in /tmp leaves the s ts unencrypted. On Operating Systems which /tmp is not a tmpfs but part of the root partition, the directory is only cleared on boot and the decryp emains when the host is switched off. The system will be vulnerable when the system is not running. So decrypted data must be cleared as soon as possible and the data which normally is encrypted ble. | ||||
| CVE-2019-19337 | 1 Redhat | 1 Ceph Storage | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Red Hat Ceph Storage version 3 in the way the Ceph RADOS Gateway daemon handles S3 requests. An authenticated attacker can abuse this flaw by causing a remote denial of service by sending a specially crafted HTTP Content-Length header to the Ceph RADOS Gateway server. | ||||
| CVE-2019-14905 | 3 Fedoraproject, Opensuse, Redhat | 8 Fedora, Backports Sle, Leap and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.6 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in Ansible Engine versions 2.9.x before 2.9.3, 2.8.x before 2.8.8, 2.7.x before 2.7.16 and earlier, where in Ansible's nxos_file_copy module can be used to copy files to a flash or bootflash on NXOS devices. Malicious code could craft the filename parameter to perform OS command injections. This could result in a loss of confidentiality of the system among other issues. | ||||
| CVE-2019-14864 | 3 Debian, Opensuse, Redhat | 9 Debian Linux, Backports Sle, Leap and 6 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Ansible, versions 2.9.x before 2.9.1, 2.8.x before 2.8.7 and Ansible versions 2.7.x before 2.7.15, is not respecting the flag no_log set it to True when Sumologic and Splunk callback plugins are used send tasks results events to collectors. This would discloses and collects any sensitive data. | ||||
| CVE-2019-14859 | 2 Python-ecdsa Project, Redhat | 6 Python-ecdsa, Ceph Storage, Openstack and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.1 Critical |
| A flaw was found in all python-ecdsa versions before 0.13.3, where it did not correctly verify whether signatures used DER encoding. Without this verification, a malformed signature could be accepted, making the signature malleable. Without proper verification, an attacker could use a malleable signature to create false transactions. | ||||
| CVE-2018-7262 | 2 Fedoraproject, Redhat | 3 Fedora, Ceph, Ceph Storage | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In Ceph before 12.2.3 and 13.x through 13.0.1, the rgw_civetweb.cc RGWCivetWeb::init_env function in radosgw doesn't handle malformed HTTP headers properly, allowing for denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2018-20677 | 2 Getbootstrap, Redhat | 8 Bootstrap, Ceph Storage, Enterprise Linux and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In Bootstrap before 3.4.0, XSS is possible in the affix configuration target property. | ||||
| CVE-2018-20676 | 2 Getbootstrap, Redhat | 8 Bootstrap, Ceph Storage, Enterprise Linux and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In Bootstrap before 3.4.0, XSS is possible in the tooltip data-viewport attribute. | ||||
| CVE-2018-1129 | 4 Ceph, Debian, Opensuse and 1 more | 10 Ceph, Debian Linux, Leap and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| A flaw was found in the way signature calculation was handled by cephx authentication protocol. An attacker having access to ceph cluster network who is able to alter the message payload was able to bypass signature checks done by cephx protocol. Ceph branches master, mimic, luminous and jewel are believed to be vulnerable. | ||||
| CVE-2018-1128 | 3 Debian, Opensuse, Redhat | 10 Debian Linux, Leap, Ceph and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| It was found that cephx authentication protocol did not verify ceph clients correctly and was vulnerable to replay attack. Any attacker having access to ceph cluster network who is able to sniff packets on network can use this vulnerability to authenticate with ceph service and perform actions allowed by ceph service. Ceph branches master, mimic, luminous and jewel are believed to be vulnerable. | ||||
| CVE-2018-1059 | 3 Canonical, Dpdk, Redhat | 11 Ubuntu Linux, Data Plane Development Kit, Ceph Storage and 8 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| The DPDK vhost-user interface does not check to verify that all the requested guest physical range is mapped and contiguous when performing Guest Physical Addresses to Host Virtual Addresses translations. This may lead to a malicious guest exposing vhost-user backend process memory. All versions before 18.02.1 are vulnerable. | ||||
| CVE-2018-19039 | 3 Grafana, Netapp, Redhat | 7 Grafana, Active Iq Performance Analytics Services, Storagegrid Webscale Nas Bridge and 4 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Grafana before 4.6.5 and 5.x before 5.3.3 allows remote authenticated users to read arbitrary files by leveraging Editor or Admin permissions. | ||||
| CVE-2018-18623 | 2 Grafana, Redhat | 2 Grafana, Ceph Storage | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| Grafana 5.3.1 has XSS via the "Dashboard > Text Panel" screen. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2018-12099. | ||||
| CVE-2018-16889 | 1 Redhat | 2 Ceph, Ceph Storage | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Ceph does not properly sanitize encryption keys in debug logging for v4 auth. This results in the leaking of encryption key information in log files via plaintext. Versions up to v13.2.4 are vulnerable. | ||||
| CVE-2018-16846 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Opensuse and 1 more | 6 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Leap and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| It was found in Ceph versions before 13.2.4 that authenticated ceph RGW users can cause a denial of service against OMAPs holding bucket indices. | ||||
| CVE-2018-15727 | 2 Grafana, Redhat | 3 Grafana, Ceph Storage, Storage | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Grafana 2.x, 3.x, and 4.x before 4.6.4 and 5.x before 5.2.3 allows authentication bypass because an attacker can generate a valid "remember me" cookie knowing only a username of an LDAP or OAuth user. | ||||