| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Improper input validation within the XOCL driver may allow a local attacker to generate an integer overflow condition, potentially resulting in crash or denial of service. |
| Insufficient parameter validation while allocating process space in the Trusted OS (TOS) may allow for a malicious userspace process to trigger an integer overflow, leading to a potential denial of service. |
| Improper input validation within the XOCL driver may allow a local attacker to generate an integer overflow condition, potentially resulting in loss of confidentiality or availability. |
| Improper removal of sensitive information before storage or transfer in AMD Crash Defender could allow an attacker to obtain kernel address information potentially resulting in loss of confidentiality. |
| Improper input validation within RAS TA Driver can allow a local attacker to access out-of-bounds memory, potentially resulting in a denial-of-service condition. |
| Improper input validation in Satellite Management Controller (SMC) may allow an attacker with privileges to manipulate Redfish® API commands to remove files from the local root directory, potentially resulting in data corruption. |
| Improper validation of an array index in the AND power Management Firmware could allow a privileged attacker to corrupt AGESA memory potentially leading to a loss of integrity. |
| Write what were condition within AMD CPUs may allow an admin-privileged attacker to modify the configuration of the CPU pipeline potentially resulting in the corruption of the stack pointer inside an SEV-SNP guest. |
| Insufficient bounds checking in AMD TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) could allow an attacker with a compromised userspace to invoke a command with malformed arguments leading to out of bounds memory access, potentially resulting in loss of integrity or availability. |
| Improper validation of an array index in the AMD graphics driver software could allow an attacker to pass malformed arguments to the dynamic power management (DPM) functions resulting in an out of bounds read and loss of availability. |
| Improper Hardware reset flow logic in the GPU GFX Hardware IP block could allow a privileged attacker in a guest virtual machine to control reset operation potentially causing host or GPU crash or reset resulting in denial of service. |
| An out-of-bounds read in the ASP could allow a privileged attacker with access to a malicious bootloader to potentially read sensitive memory resulting in loss of confidentiality. |
| A buffer overflow in the AMD Secure Processor (ASP) bootloader could allow an attacker to overwrite memory, potentially resulting in privilege escalation and arbitrary code execution. |
| An integer overflow in the SMU could allow a privileged attacker to potentially write memory beyond the end of the reserved dRAM area resulting in loss of integrity or availability. |
| Incorrect default permissions in AMD StoreMI™ could allow an attacker to achieve privilege escalation potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution. |
| Improper input validation in AMD Graphics Driver could allow an attacker to supply a specially crafted pointer, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution. |
| Failure to validate the address and size in TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) may allow a malicious x86 attacker to send malformed messages to the graphics mailbox resulting in an overlap of a TMR (Trusted Memory Region) that was previously allocated by the ASP bootloader leading to a potential loss of integrity. |
| Improper cleanup in AMD CPU microcode patch loading could allow an attacker with local administrator privilege to load malicious CPU microcode, potentially resulting in loss of integrity of x86 instruction execution. |
| Improper handling of insufficient entropy in the AMD CPUs could allow a local attacker to influence the values returned by the RDSEED instruction, potentially resulting in the consumption of insufficiently random values. |
| Improper access control in secure encrypted virtualization (SEV) could allow a privileged attacker to write to the reverse map page (RMP) during secure nested paging (SNP) initialization, potentially resulting in a loss of guest memory confidentiality and integrity. |
