Filtered by vendor Sonicwall
Subscriptions
Total
197 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-0126 | 1 Sonicwall | 2 Sma1000, Sma1000 Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Pre-authentication path traversal vulnerability in SMA1000 firmware version 12.4.2, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to access arbitrary files and directories stored outside the web root directory. | ||||
| CVE-2022-2915 | 1 Sonicwall | 10 Sma 200, Sma 200 Firmware, Sma 210 and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| A Heap-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability in the SonicWall SMA100 appliance allows a remote authenticated attacker to cause Denial of Service (DoS) on the appliance or potentially lead to code execution. This vulnerability impacts 10.2.1.5-34sv and earlier versions. | ||||
| CVE-2022-2324 | 1 Sonicwall | 1 Email Security | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Improperly Implemented Security Check vulnerability in the SonicWall Hosted Email Security leads to bypass of Capture ATP security service in the appliance. This vulnerability impacts 10.0.17.7319 and earlier versions | ||||
| CVE-2022-2323 | 1 Sonicwall | 14 Sws12-10fpoe, Sws12-10fpoe Firmware, Sws12-8 and 11 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| Improper neutralization of special elements used in a user input allows an authenticated malicious user to perform remote code execution in the host system. This vulnerability impacts SonicWall Switch 1.1.1.0-2s and earlier versions | ||||
| CVE-2022-22282 | 1 Sonicwall | 10 Sma 6200, Sma 6200 Firmware, Sma 6210 and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| SonicWall SMA1000 series firmware 12.4.0, 12.4.1-02965 and earlier versions incorrectly restricts access to a resource using HTTP connections from an unauthorized actor leading to Improper Access Control vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22281 | 1 Sonicwall | 1 Netextender | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability in the SonicWall SSL-VPN NetExtender Windows Client (32 and 64 bit) in 10.2.322 and earlier versions, allows an attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code in the host windows operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22280 | 1 Sonicwall | 2 Analytics, Global Management System | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command leading to Unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability, impacting SonicWall GMS 9.3.1-SP2-Hotfix1, Analytics On-Prem 2.5.0.3-2520 and earlier versions. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22279 | 1 Sonicwall | 10 Sma 210, Sma 210 Firmware, Sma 410 and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.9 Medium |
| A post-authentication arbitrary file read vulnerability impacting end-of-life Secure Remote Access (SRA) products and older firmware versions of Secure Mobile Access (SMA) 100 series products, specifically the SRA appliances running all 8.x, 9.0.0.5-19sv and earlier versions and Secure Mobile Access (SMA) 100 series products running older firmware 9.0.0.9-26sv and earlier versions | ||||
| CVE-2022-22278 | 1 Sonicwall | 98 Nsa 2650, Nsa 2650 Firmware, Nsa 2700 and 95 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability in SonicOS CFS (Content filtering service) returns a large 403 forbidden HTTP response message to the source address when users try to access prohibited resource this allows an attacker to cause HTTP Denial of Service (DoS) attack | ||||
| CVE-2022-22277 | 1 Sonicwall | 98 Nsa 2650, Nsa 2650 Firmware, Nsa 2700 and 95 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability in SonicOS SNMP service resulting exposure of Wireless Access Point sensitive information in cleartext. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22276 | 1 Sonicwall | 98 Nsa 2650, Nsa 2650 Firmware, Nsa 2700 and 95 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability in SonicOS SNMP service resulting exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized user. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22275 | 1 Sonicwall | 53 Nsa 2650, Nsa 2700, Nsa 3650 and 50 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Improper Restriction of TCP Communication Channel in HTTP/S inbound traffic from WAN to DMZ bypassing security policy until TCP handshake potentially resulting in Denial of Service (DoS) attack if a target host is vulnerable. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22274 | 1 Sonicwall | 33 Nsa 2700, Nsa 3700, Nsa 4700 and 30 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| A Stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability in the SonicOS via HTTP request allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause Denial of Service (DoS) or potentially results in code execution in the firewall. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22273 | 1 Sonicwall | 20 Sma 100, Sma 200, Sma 200 Firmware and 17 more | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Improper neutralization of Special Elements leading to OS Command Injection vulnerability impacting end-of-life Secure Remote Access (SRA) products and older firmware versions of Secure Mobile Access (SMA) 100 series products, specifically the SRA appliances running all 8.x, 9.0.0.5-19sv and earlier versions and Secure Mobile Access (SMA) 100 series products running older firmware 9.0.0.9-26sv and earlier versions | ||||
| CVE-2022-1703 | 1 Sonicwall | 6 Sma 210, Sma 210 Firmware, Sma 410 and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| Improper neutralization of special elements in the SonicWall SSL-VPN SMA100 series management interface allows a remote authenticated attacker to inject OS Commands which potentially leads to remote command execution vulnerability or denial of service (DoS) attack. | ||||
| CVE-2022-1702 | 1 Sonicwall | 10 Sma 6200, Sma 6200 Firmware, Sma 6210 and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| SonicWall SMA1000 series firmware 12.4.0, 12.4.1-02965 and earlier versions accept a user-controlled input that specifies a link to an external site and uses that link in a redirect which leads to Open redirection vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2022-1701 | 1 Sonicwall | 10 Sma 6200, Sma 6200 Firmware, Sma 6210 and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| SonicWall SMA1000 series firmware 12.4.0, 12.4.1-02965 and earlier versions uses a shared and hard-coded encryption key to store data. | ||||
| CVE-2021-45105 | 6 Apache, Debian, Netapp and 3 more | 131 Log4j, Debian Linux, Cloud Manager and 128 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| Apache Log4j2 versions 2.0-alpha1 through 2.16.0 (excluding 2.12.3 and 2.3.1) did not protect from uncontrolled recursion from self-referential lookups. This allows an attacker with control over Thread Context Map data to cause a denial of service when a crafted string is interpreted. This issue was fixed in Log4j 2.17.0, 2.12.3, and 2.3.1. | ||||
| CVE-2021-3450 | 11 Fedoraproject, Freebsd, Mcafee and 8 more | 39 Fedora, Freebsd, Web Gateway and 36 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.4 High |
| The X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT flag enables additional security checks of the certificates present in a certificate chain. It is not set by default. Starting from OpenSSL version 1.1.1h a check to disallow certificates in the chain that have explicitly encoded elliptic curve parameters was added as an additional strict check. An error in the implementation of this check meant that the result of a previous check to confirm that certificates in the chain are valid CA certificates was overwritten. This effectively bypasses the check that non-CA certificates must not be able to issue other certificates. If a "purpose" has been configured then there is a subsequent opportunity for checks that the certificate is a valid CA. All of the named "purpose" values implemented in libcrypto perform this check. Therefore, where a purpose is set the certificate chain will still be rejected even when the strict flag has been used. A purpose is set by default in libssl client and server certificate verification routines, but it can be overridden or removed by an application. In order to be affected, an application must explicitly set the X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT verification flag and either not set a purpose for the certificate verification or, in the case of TLS client or server applications, override the default purpose. OpenSSL versions 1.1.1h and newer are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1h-1.1.1j). | ||||
| CVE-2021-3449 | 13 Checkpoint, Debian, Fedoraproject and 10 more | 172 Multi-domain Management, Multi-domain Management Firmware, Quantum Security Gateway and 169 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. If a TLSv1.2 renegotiation ClientHello omits the signature_algorithms extension (where it was present in the initial ClientHello), but includes a signature_algorithms_cert extension then a NULL pointer dereference will result, leading to a crash and a denial of service attack. A server is only vulnerable if it has TLSv1.2 and renegotiation enabled (which is the default configuration). OpenSSL TLS clients are not impacted by this issue. All OpenSSL 1.1.1 versions are affected by this issue. Users of these versions should upgrade to OpenSSL 1.1.1k. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is not impacted by this issue. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.1.1k (Affected 1.1.1-1.1.1j). | ||||