Filtered by vendor Pulsesecure
Subscriptions
Total
93 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2019-11478 | 6 Canonical, F5, Ivanti and 3 more | 29 Ubuntu Linux, Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager and 26 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Jonathan Looney discovered that the TCP retransmission queue implementation in tcp_fragment in the Linux kernel could be fragmented when handling certain TCP Selective Acknowledgment (SACK) sequences. A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. This has been fixed in stable kernel releases 4.4.182, 4.9.182, 4.14.127, 4.19.52, 5.1.11, and is fixed in commit f070ef2ac66716357066b683fb0baf55f8191a2e. | ||||
| CVE-2019-11477 | 6 Canonical, F5, Ivanti and 3 more | 29 Ubuntu Linux, Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager and 26 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Jonathan Looney discovered that the TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_gso_segs value was subject to an integer overflow in the Linux kernel when handling TCP Selective Acknowledgments (SACKs). A remote attacker could use this to cause a denial of service. This has been fixed in stable kernel releases 4.4.182, 4.9.182, 4.14.127, 4.19.52, 5.1.11, and is fixed in commit 3b4929f65b0d8249f19a50245cd88ed1a2f78cff. | ||||
| CVE-2019-11213 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 3 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Secure Desktop Client | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In Pulse Secure Pulse Desktop Client and Network Connect, an attacker could access session tokens to replay and spoof sessions, and as a result, gain unauthorized access as an end user, a related issue to CVE-2019-1573. (The endpoint would need to be already compromised for exploitation to succeed.) This affects Pulse Desktop Client 5.x before Secure Desktop 5.3R7 and Pulse Desktop Client 9.x before Secure Desktop 9.0R3. It also affects (for Network Connect customers) Pulse Connect Secure 8.1 before 8.1R14, 8.3 before 8.3R7, and 9.0 before 9.0R3. | ||||
| CVE-2018-9849 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Pulse Connect Secure | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure 8.1.x before 8.1R14, 8.2.x before 8.2R11, and 8.3.x before 8.3R5 do not properly process nested XML entities, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption and memory errors) via a crafted XML document. | ||||
| CVE-2018-7572 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Pulse Secure Desktop | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Pulse Secure Client 9.0R1 and 5.3RX before 5.3R5, when configured to authenticate VPN users during Windows Logon, can allow attackers to bypass Windows authentication and execute commands on the system with the privileges of Pulse Secure Client. The attacker must interrupt the client's network connectivity, and trigger a connection to a crafted proxy server with an invalid SSL certificate that allows certification-manager access, leading to the ability to browse local files and execute local programs. | ||||
| CVE-2018-6374 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Desktop Linux Client | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| The GUI component (aka PulseUI) in Pulse Secure Desktop Linux clients before PULSE5.2R9.2 and 5.3.x before PULSE5.3R4.2 does not perform strict SSL Certificate Validation. This can lead to the manipulation of the Pulse Connection set. | ||||
| CVE-2018-6320 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 3 Connect Secure, Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| A vulnerability has been discovered in login.cgi in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.1RX before 8.1R12 and 8.3RX before 8.3R2 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) 5.2RX before 5.2R9 and 5.4RX before 5.4R2 wherein an http(s) Host header received from the browser is trusted without validation. | ||||
| CVE-2018-5299 | 1 Pulsesecure | 2 Pulse Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| A stack-based Buffer Overflow Vulnerability exists in the web server in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) before 8.3R4 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) before 5.4R4, leading to memory corruption and possibly remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2018-20814 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 2 Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| An XSS issue was found with Psaldownload.cgi in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.3R2 before 8.3R2 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) 5.4RX before 5.4R2. This is not applicable to PCS 8.1RX or PPS 5.2RX. | ||||
| CVE-2018-20812 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Pulse Secure Desktop Client | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| An information exposure issue where IPv6 DNS traffic would be sent outside of the VPN tunnel (when Traffic Enforcement was enabled) exists in Pulse Secure Pulse Secure Desktop 9.0R1 and below. This is applicable only to dual-stack (IPv4/IPv6) endpoints. | ||||
| CVE-2018-20810 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 2 Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Session data between cluster nodes during cluster synchronization is not properly encrypted in Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.3RX before 8.3R2 and Pulse Policy Secure (PPS) 5.4RX before 5.4R2. This is not applicable to PCS 8.1RX, PPS 5.2RX, or stand-alone devices. | ||||
| CVE-2018-20809 | 2 Ivanti, Pulsesecure | 2 Connect Secure, Pulse Policy Secure | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| A crafted message can cause the web server to crash with Pulse Secure Pulse Connect Secure (PCS) 8.3RX before 8.3R5 and Pulse Policy Secure 5.4RX before 5.4R5. This is not applicable to PCS 8.1RX. | ||||
| CVE-2018-20307 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Virtual Traffic Manager | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| Pulse Secure Virtual Traffic Manager 9.9 versions prior to 9.9r2 and 10.4r1 allow a remote authenticated user to obtain sensitive historical activity information by leveraging incorrect permission validation. | ||||
| CVE-2018-20306 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Virtual Traffic Manager | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| A stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the web administration user interface of Pulse Secure Virtual Traffic Manager may allow a remote authenticated attacker to inject web script or HTML via a crafted website and steal sensitive data and credentials. Affected releases are Pulse Secure Virtual Traffic Manager 9.9 versions prior to 9.9r2 and 10.4r1. | ||||
| CVE-2018-20193 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Secure Access Series Ssl Vpn Sa-4000 | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Certain Secure Access SA Series SSL VPN products (originally developed by Juniper Networks but now sold and supported by Pulse Secure, LLC) allow privilege escalation, as demonstrated by Secure Access SSL VPN SA-4000 5.1R5 (build 9627) 4.2 Release (build 7631). This occurs because appropriate controls are not performed. Specifically, it is possible for a readonly user to change the administrator user password by making a local copy of the /dana-admin/user/update.cgi page, changing the "user" value, and saving the changes. | ||||
| CVE-2018-18284 | 5 Artifex, Canonical, Debian and 2 more | 12 Ghostscript, Gpl Ghostscript, Ubuntu Linux and 9 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Artifex Ghostscript 9.25 and earlier allows attackers to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors involving the 1Policy operator. | ||||
| CVE-2018-16513 | 4 Artifex, Canonical, Debian and 1 more | 5 Ghostscript, Gpl Ghostscript, Ubuntu Linux and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In Artifex Ghostscript before 9.24, attackers able to supply crafted PostScript files could use a type confusion in the setcolor function to crash the interpreter or possibly have unspecified other impact. | ||||
| CVE-2018-16261 | 1 Pulsesecure | 1 Pulse Secure Desktop Client | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In Pulse Secure Pulse Desktop Client 5.3RX before 5.3R5 and 9.0R1, there is a Privilege Escalation Vulnerability with Dynamic Certificate Trust. | ||||
| CVE-2018-15911 | 5 Artifex, Canonical, Debian and 2 more | 12 Ghostscript, Gpl Ghostscript, Ubuntu Linux and 9 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In Artifex Ghostscript 9.23 before 2018-08-24, attackers able to supply crafted PostScript could use uninitialized memory access in the aesdecode operator to crash the interpreter or potentially execute code. | ||||
| CVE-2018-15910 | 5 Artifex, Canonical, Debian and 2 more | 10 Ghostscript, Gpl Ghostscript, Ubuntu Linux and 7 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In Artifex Ghostscript before 9.24, attackers able to supply crafted PostScript files could use a type confusion in the LockDistillerParams parameter to crash the interpreter or execute code. | ||||