| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in Linux Ratfor 1.06 and earlier. When the software processes a file which is specially crafted by an attacker, arbitrary code may be executed. As a result, the attacker may obtain or alter information of the user environment or cause the user environment to become unusable. |
| An unauthenticated attacker can trigger a stack based buffer overflow in the DP Service (TCP port 3500). This vulnerability has been resolved in firmware version 2.800.0000000.8.R.20241111. |
| NetOp (now part of Impero Software) Remote Control Client v9.5 is vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow when processing .dws configuration files. If a .dws file contains a string longer than 520 bytes, the application fails to perform proper bounds checking, allowing an attacker to execute arbitrary code when the file is opened. |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker may use a stack based buffer overflow in the u-link Management API to gain full access on the affected devices. |
| A vulnerability has been found in Linksys WRT1900ACS, EA7200, EA7450 and EA7500 up to 20250619 and classified as critical. This vulnerability affects the function SetDefaultConnectionService of the file /upnp/control/Layer3Forwarding of the component IGD. The manipulation of the argument NewDefaultConnectionService leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in joelittlejohn jsonschema2pojo 1.2.2. This issue affects the function apply of the file org/jsonschema2pojo/rules/SchemaRule.java of the component JSON File Handler. The manipulation leads to stack-based buffer overflow. Attacking locally is a requirement. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| An authenticated attacker can trigger a stack based buffer overflow in the DHIP Service (TCP port 80). This vulnerability has been resolved in firmware version 2.800.0000000.8.R.20241111. |
| A potential buffer overflow vulnerability was reported in some Lenovo Notebook products that could allow a local attacker with elevated privileges to execute arbitrary code. |
| libglxproto.c in OpenGL libglvnd bb06db5a was discovered to contain a segmentation violation via the function glXGetDrawableScreen(). NOTE: this is disputed because there are no common situations in which users require uninterrupted operation with an attacker-controller server. |
| Fuji Electric Smart Editor is vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow, which may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code. |
| An authenticated attacker may trigger a stack based buffer overflow by performing a malformed request to either the HTTP service (TCP port 80), the HTTPS service (TCP port 443), or the IPP service (TCP port 631). The malformed request will contain an empty Origin header value and a malformed Referer header value. The Referer header value will trigger a stack based buffer overflow when the host value in the Referer header is processed and is greater than 64 bytes in length. |
| The vulnerability was identified in the code developed specifically for Lenovo. Please visit "Lenovo Product Security Advisories and Announcements" webpage for more information about the vulnerability. https://support.lenovo.com/us/en/product_security/home |
| A vulnerability classified as critical was found in uYanki board-stm32f103rc-berial up to 84daed541609cb7b46854cc6672a275d1007e295. This vulnerability affects the function heartrate1_i2c_hal_write of the file 7.Example/hal/i2c/max30100/Manual/demo2/2/heartrate1_hal.c. The manipulation of the argument num leads to stack-based buffer overflow. Continious delivery with rolling releases is used by this product. Therefore, no version details of affected nor updated releases are available. |
| Fuji Electric Alpha5 SMART
is vulnerable to a stack-based buffer overflow, which may allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code. |
| SpotFTP-FTP Password Recover 2.4.8 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows attackers to crash the application by generating a large buffer overflow. Attackers can create a text file with 1000 'Z' characters and input it as a registration code to trigger the application crash. |
| xmedcon 0.23.0 and fixed in v.0.24.0 is vulnerable to Buffer Overflow via libs/dicom/basic.c which allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code. |
| A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in ActFax Server version 5.01. The server's RAW protocol interface fails to safely process user-supplied data in @F506 fax header fields due to insecure usage of strcpy. Remote attackers can exploit this vulnerability by sending specially crafted @F506 fields, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution. Successful exploitation requires network access to TCP port 4559 and does not require authentication. |
| Stack buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the Supermicro BMC Shared library. An authenticated attacker with access to the BMC exploit stack buffer via a crafted header and achieve arbitrary code execution of the BMC’s firmware operating system. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in SEIKO EPSON Web Config. Specially crafted data input by a logged-in user may execute arbitrary code. As for the details of the affected products and versions, see the information provided by the vendor under [References]. |
| Exporting a TPM based RSA key larger than 2048 bits from the TPM could overrun a stack buffer if the default `MAX_RSA_KEY_BITS=2048` is used. If your TPM 2.0 module supports RSA key sizes larger than 2048 bit and your applications supports creating or importing an RSA private or public key larger than 2048 bits and your application calls `wolfTPM2_RsaKey_TpmToWolf` on that key, then a stack buffer could be overrun. If the `MAX_RSA_KEY_BITS` build-time macro is set correctly (RSA bits match what TPM hardware is capable of) for the hardware target, then a stack overrun is not possible. |
