Total
151 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-1099 | 2025-02-14 | N/A | ||
| This vulnerability exists in Tapo C500 Wi-Fi camera due to hard-coded RSA private key embedded within the device firmware. An attacker with physical access could exploit this vulnerability to obtain cryptographic private keys which can then be used to perform impersonation, data decryption and man in the middle attacks on the targeted device. | ||||
| CVE-2024-35344 | 2025-02-13 | 9.9 Critical | ||
| Certain Anpviz products contain a hardcoded cryptographic key stored in the firmware of the device. This affects IPC-D250, IPC-D260, IPC-B850, IPC-D850, IPC-D350, IPC-D3150, IPC-D4250, IPC-D380, IPC-D880, IPC-D280, IPC-D3180, MC800N, YM500L, YM800N_N2, YMF50B, YM800SV2, YM500L8, and YM200E10 firmware v3.2.2.2 and lower and possibly more vendors/models of IP camera. | ||||
| CVE-2024-33849 | 2025-02-13 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| ci solution CI-Out-of-Office Manager through 6.0.0.77 uses a Hard-coded Cryptographic Key. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12078 | 2025-02-12 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| ECOVACS robot lawn mowers and vacuums use a shared, static secret key to encrypt BLE GATT messages. An unauthenticated attacker within BLE range can control any robot using the same key. | ||||
| CVE-2024-33891 | 1 Delinea | 1 Secret Server | 2025-02-12 | 8.8 High |
| Delinea Secret Server before 11.7.000001 allows attackers to bypass authentication via the SOAP API in SecretServer/webservices/SSWebService.asmx. This is related to a hardcoded key, the use of the integer 2 for the Admin user, and removal of the oauthExpirationId attribute. | ||||
| CVE-2024-33504 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimanager | 2025-02-11 | 3.9 Low |
| A use of hard-coded cryptographic key to encrypt sensitive data vulnerability [CWE-321] in FortiManager 7.6.0 through 7.6.1, 7.4.0 through 7.4.5, 7.2.0 through 7.2.9, 7.0 all versions, 6.4 all versions may allow an attacker with JSON API access permissions to decrypt some secrets even if the 'private-data-encryption' setting is enabled. | ||||
| CVE-2024-52881 | 2025-02-10 | 7.5 High | ||
| An issue was discovered in AudioCodes One Voice Operations Center (OVOC) before 8.4.582. Due to the use of a hard-coded key, an attacker is able to decrypt sensitive data such as passwords extracted from the topology file. | ||||
| CVE-2024-50564 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2025-02-03 | 3.2 Low |
| A use of hard-coded cryptographic key in Fortinet FortiClientWindows version 7.4.0, 7.2.x all versions, 7.0.x all versions, and 6.4.x all versions may allow a low-privileged user to decrypt interprocess communication via monitoring named piped. | ||||
| CVE-2023-2158 | 1 Synopsys | 1 Code Dx | 2025-01-31 | 9.8 Critical |
| Code Dx versions prior to 2023.4.2 are vulnerable to user impersonation attack where a malicious actor is able to gain access to another user's account by crafting a custom "Remember Me" token. This is possible due to the use of a hard-coded cipher which was used when generating the token. A malicious actor who creates this token can supply it to a separate Code Dx system, provided they know the username they want to impersonate, and impersonate the user. Score 6.7 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N/E:P/RL:O/RC:C | ||||
| CVE-2023-37936 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortiswitch | 2025-01-31 | 9.6 Critical |
| A use of hard-coded cryptographic key in Fortinet FortiSwitch version 7.4.0 and 7.2.0 through 7.2.5 and 7.0.0 through 7.0.7 and 6.4.0 through 6.4.13 and 6.2.0 through 6.2.7 and 6.0.0 through 6.0.7 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted requests. | ||||
| CVE-2023-21404 | 1 Axis | 1 Axis Os | 2025-01-29 | 4.1 Medium |
| AXIS OS 11.0.X - 11.3.x use a static RSA key in legacy LUA-components to protect Axis-specific source code. The static RSA key is not used in any other secure communication nor can it be used to compromise the device or any customer data. | ||||
| CVE-2023-44318 | 1 Siemens | 142 6ag1206-2bb00-7ac2, 6ag1206-2bb00-7ac2 Firmware, 6ag1206-2bs00-7ac2 and 139 more | 2025-01-14 | 4.9 Medium |
| Affected devices use a hardcoded key to obfuscate the configuration backup that an administrator can export from the device. This could allow an authenticated attacker with administrative privileges or an attacker that obtains a configuration backup to extract configuration information from the exported file. | ||||
| CVE-2023-2637 | 1 Rockwellautomation | 2 Factorytalk Policy Manager, Factorytalk System Services | 2025-01-02 | 7.3 High |
| Rockwell Automation's FactoryTalk System Services uses a hard-coded cryptographic key to generate administrator cookies. Hard-coded cryptographic key may lead to privilege escalation. This vulnerability may allow a local, authenticated non-admin user to generate an invalid administrator cookie giving them administrative privileges to the FactoryTalk Policy Manger database. This may allow the threat actor to make malicious changes to the database that will be deployed when a legitimate FactoryTalk Policy Manager user deploys a security policy model. User interaction is required for this vulnerability to be successfully exploited. | ||||
| CVE-2023-21705 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Sql Server | 2025-01-01 | 8.8 High |
| Microsoft SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2023-27584 | 2 Dragonflyoss, Linuxfoundation | 2 Dragonfly2, Dragonfly | 2024-12-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| Dragonfly is an open source P2P-based file distribution and image acceleration system. It is hosted by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) as an Incubating Level Project. Dragonfly uses JWT to verify user. However, the secret key for JWT, "Secret Key", is hard coded, which leads to authentication bypass. An attacker can perform any action as a user with admin privileges. This issue has been addressed in release version 2.0.9. All users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1920 | 1 Osuuu | 1 Lightpicture | 2024-12-18 | 5.6 Medium |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been found in osuuu LightPicture up to 1.2.2. This issue affects the function handle of the file /app/middleware/TokenVerify.php. The manipulation leads to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The attack may be initiated remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The associated identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-254855. | ||||
| CVE-2024-5722 | 1 Logsign | 1 Unified Secops | 2024-11-26 | N/A |
| Logsign Unified SecOps Platform HTTP API Hard-coded Cryptographic Key Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows network-adjacent attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Logsign Unified SecOps Platform. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the HTTP API. The issue results from using a hard-coded cryptographic key. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of root. Was ZDI-CAN-24170. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10920 | 1 Mariazevedo88 | 1 Travels-java-api | 2024-11-22 | 3.1 Low |
| A vulnerability was found in mariazevedo88 travels-java-api up to 5.0.1 and classified as problematic. Affected by this issue is the function doFilterInternal of the file travels-java-api-master\src\main\java\io\github\mariazevedo88\travelsjavaapi\filters\JwtAuthenticationTokenFilter.java of the component JWT Secret Handler. The manipulation leads to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The attack may be launched remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitation is known to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2024-45837 | 2024-11-22 | N/A | ||
| Use of hard-coded cryptographic key issue exists in AIPHONE IX SYSTEM, IXG SYSTEM, and System Support Software. A network-adjacent unauthenticated attacker may log in to SFTP service and obtain and/or manipulate unauthorized files. | ||||
| CVE-2023-34338 | 1 Ami | 1 Megarac Sp-x | 2024-11-21 | 7.1 High |
| AMI SPx contains a vulnerability in the BMC where an Attacker may cause a use of hard-coded cryptographic key by a hard-coded certificate. A successful exploit of this vulnerability may lead to a loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. | ||||