Filtered by vendor F5
Subscriptions
Total
867 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-23805 | 1 F5 | 2 Big-ip Advanced Web Application Firewall, Big-ip Application Security Manager | 2025-01-23 | 7.5 High |
| Undisclosed requests can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate. For the Application Visibility and Reporting module, this may occur when the HTTP Analytics profile with URLs enabled under Collected Entities is configured on a virtual server and the DB variables avr.IncludeServerInURI or avr.CollectOnlyHostnameFromURI are enabled. For BIG-IP Advanced WAF and ASM, this may occur when either a DoS or Bot Defense profile is configured on a virtual server and the DB variables avr.IncludeServerInURI or avr.CollectOnlyHostnameFromURI are enabled. Note: The DB variables avr.IncludeServerInURI and avr.CollectOnlyHostnameFromURI are not enabled by default. For more information about the HTTP Analytics profile and the Collect URLs setting, refer to K30875743: Create a new Analytics profile and attach it to your virtual servers https://my.f5.com/manage/s/article/K30875743 . Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated | ||||
| CVE-2024-23306 | 1 F5 | 1 Big-ip Next Cloud-native Network Functions | 2025-01-23 | 4.4 Medium |
| A vulnerability exists in BIG-IP Next CNF and SPK systems that may allow access to undisclosed sensitive files. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated | ||||
| CVE-2024-22389 | 1 F5 | 12 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 9 more | 2025-01-23 | 7.2 High |
| When BIG-IP is deployed in high availability (HA) and an iControl REST API token is updated, the change does not sync to the peer device. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated | ||||
| CVE-2024-22093 | 1 F5 | 12 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 9 more | 2025-01-23 | 8.7 High |
| When running in appliance mode, an authenticated remote command injection vulnerability exists in an undisclosed iControl REST endpoint on multi-bladed systems. A successful exploit can allow the attacker to cross a security boundary. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated | ||||
| CVE-2024-21782 | 1 F5 | 12 Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager, Big-ip Analytics and 9 more | 2025-01-23 | 6.7 Medium |
| BIG-IP or BIG-IQ Resource Administrators and Certificate Managers who have access to the secure copy (scp) utility but do not have access to Advanced shell (bash) can execute arbitrary commands with a specially crafted command string. This vulnerability is due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-5873. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated | ||||
| CVE-2024-21771 | 1 F5 | 1 Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager | 2025-01-23 | 7.5 High |
| For unspecified traffic patterns, BIG-IP AFM IPS engine may spend an excessive amount of time matching the traffic against signatures, resulting in Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) restarting and traffic disruption. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated | ||||
| CVE-2024-7347 | 1 F5 | 2 Nginx Open Source, Nginx Plus | 2025-01-22 | 4.7 Medium |
| NGINX Open Source and NGINX Plus have a vulnerability in the ngx_http_mp4_module, which might allow an attacker to over-read NGINX worker memory resulting in its termination, using a specially crafted mp4 file. The issue only affects NGINX if it is built with the ngx_http_mp4_module and the mp4 directive is used in the configuration file. Additionally, the attack is possible only if an attacker can trigger the processing of a specially crafted mp4 file with the ngx_http_mp4_module. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. | ||||
| CVE-2024-3661 | 10 Apple, Cisco, Citrix and 7 more | 13 Iphone Os, Macos, Anyconnect Vpn Client and 10 more | 2025-01-15 | 7.6 High |
| DHCP can add routes to a client’s routing table via the classless static route option (121). VPN-based security solutions that rely on routes to redirect traffic can be forced to leak traffic over the physical interface. An attacker on the same local network can read, disrupt, or possibly modify network traffic that was expected to be protected by the VPN. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9511 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 29 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 26 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to window size manipulation and stream prioritization manipulation, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker requests a large amount of data from a specified resource over multiple streams. They manipulate window size and stream priority to force the server to queue the data in 1-byte chunks. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9513 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 25 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 22 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to resource loops, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker creates multiple request streams and continually shuffles the priority of the streams in a way that causes substantial churn to the priority tree. This can consume excess CPU. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9514 | 13 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 10 more | 44 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 41 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a reset flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker opens a number of streams and sends an invalid request over each stream that should solicit a stream of RST_STREAM frames from the peer. Depending on how the peer queues the RST_STREAM frames, this can consume excess memory, CPU, or both. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9515 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 36 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 33 more | 2025-01-14 | 7.5 High |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a settings flood, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of SETTINGS frames to the peer. Since the RFC requires that the peer reply with one acknowledgement per SETTINGS frame, an empty SETTINGS frame is almost equivalent in behavior to a ping. Depending on how efficiently this data is queued, this can consume excess CPU, memory, or both. | ||||
| CVE-2019-9516 | 12 Apache, Apple, Canonical and 9 more | 24 Traffic Server, Mac Os X, Swiftnio and 21 more | 2025-01-14 | 6.5 Medium |
| Some HTTP/2 implementations are vulnerable to a header leak, potentially leading to a denial of service. The attacker sends a stream of headers with a 0-length header name and 0-length header value, optionally Huffman encoded into 1-byte or greater headers. Some implementations allocate memory for these headers and keep the allocation alive until the session dies. This can consume excess memory. | ||||
| CVE-2017-18017 | 9 Arista, Canonical, Debian and 6 more | 33 Eos, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 30 more | 2025-01-03 | 9.8 Critical |
| The tcpmss_mangle_packet function in net/netfilter/xt_TCPMSS.c in the Linux kernel before 4.11, and 4.9.x before 4.9.36, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (use-after-free and memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact by leveraging the presence of xt_TCPMSS in an iptables action. | ||||
| CVE-2023-44487 | 32 Akka, Amazon, Apache and 29 more | 364 Http Server, Opensearch Data Prepper, Apisix and 361 more | 2024-12-20 | 7.5 High |
| The HTTP/2 protocol allows a denial of service (server resource consumption) because request cancellation can reset many streams quickly, as exploited in the wild in August through October 2023. | ||||
| CVE-2017-13315 | 2 F5, Google | 2 Access For Android, Android | 2024-12-18 | 7.8 High |
| In writeToParcel and createFromParcel of DcParamObject.java, there is a permission bypass due to a write size mismatch. This could lead to an elevation of privileges where the user can start an activity with system privileges, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2024-21763 | 1 F5 | 2 Big-ip, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager | 2024-12-12 | 7.5 High |
| When BIG-IP AFM Device DoS or DoS profile is configured with NXDOMAIN attack vector and bad actor detection, undisclosed queries can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) to terminate. NOTE: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated | ||||
| CVE-2024-21789 | 1 F5 | 2 Big-ip Advanced Web Application Firewall, Big-ip Application Security Manager | 2024-12-12 | 7.5 High |
| When a BIG-IP ASM/Advanced WAF security policy is configured on a virtual server, undisclosed requests can cause an increase in memory resource utilization. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated | ||||
| CVE-2024-21849 | 1 F5 | 2 Big-ip Advanced Web Application Firewall, Big-ip Application Security Manager | 2024-12-12 | 7.5 High |
| When an Advanced WAF/ASM security policy and a Websockets profile are configured on a virtual server, undisclosed traffic can cause the Traffic Management Microkernel (TMM) process to terminate. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. | ||||
| CVE-2024-23308 | 1 F5 | 2 Big-ip Advanced Web Application Firewall, Big-ip Application Security Manager | 2024-12-12 | 7.5 High |
| When a BIG-IP Advanced WAF or BIG-IP ASM policy with a Request Body Handling option is attached to a virtual server, undisclosed requests can cause the BD process to terminate. The condition results from setting the Request Body Handling option in the Header-Based Content Profile for an Allowed URL with "Apply value and content signatures and detect threat campaigns." Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated | ||||