Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform
Subscriptions
Total
206 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2011-5062 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 9 Tomcat, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Communications Platform and 6 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.12 does not check qop values, which might allow remote attackers to bypass intended integrity-protection requirements via a qop=auth value, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-1184. | ||||
| CVE-2013-2186 | 2 Redhat, Ubuntu | 7 Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform, Jboss Enterprise Portal Platform, Jboss Enterprise Soa Platform and 4 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The DiskFileItem class in Apache Commons FileUpload, as used in Red Hat JBoss BRMS 5.3.1; JBoss Portal 4.3 CP07, 5.2.2, and 6.0.0; and Red Hat JBoss Web Server 1.0.2 allows remote attackers to write to arbitrary files via a NULL byte in a file name in a serialized instance. | ||||
| CVE-2009-5066 | 1 Redhat | 5 Jboss Community Application Server, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform and 2 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| twiddle.sh in JBoss AS 5.0 and EAP 5.0 and earlier accepts credentials as command-line arguments, which allows local users to read the credentials by listing the process and its arguments. | ||||
| CVE-2013-2172 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 11 Santuario Xml Security For Java, Fuse Esb Enterprise, Fuse Management Console and 8 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| jcp/xml/dsig/internal/dom/DOMCanonicalizationMethod.java in Apache Santuario XML Security for Java 1.4.x before 1.4.8 and 1.5.x before 1.5.5 allows context-dependent attackers to spoof an XML Signature by using the CanonicalizationMethod parameter to specify an arbitrary weak "canonicalization algorithm to apply to the SignedInfo part of the Signature." | ||||
| CVE-2012-5887 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 8 Tomcat, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Data Grid and 5 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The HTTP Digest Access Authentication implementation in Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.36, 6.x before 6.0.36, and 7.x before 7.0.30 does not properly check for stale nonce values in conjunction with enforcement of proper credentials, which makes it easier for remote attackers to bypass intended access restrictions by sniffing the network for valid requests. | ||||
| CVE-2012-5478 | 1 Redhat | 4 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform, Jboss Enterprise Soa Platform and 1 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The AuthorizationInterceptor in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) before 5.2.0, Web Platform (EWP) before 5.2.0, BRMS Platform before 5.3.1, and SOA Platform before 5.3.1 does not properly restrict access, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended role restrictions and perform arbitrary JMX operations via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2012-0034 | 1 Redhat | 4 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform, Jboss Enterprise Soa Platform and 1 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The NonManagedConnectionFactory in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform (EAP) 5.1.2 and 5.2.0, Web Platform (EWP) 5.1.2 and 5.2.0, and BRMS Platform before 5.3.1 logs the username and password in cleartext when an exception is thrown, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading the log file. | ||||
| CVE-2012-0022 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 10 Tomcat, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Communications Platform and 7 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.35, 6.x before 6.0.34, and 7.x before 7.0.23 uses an inefficient approach for handling parameters, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) via a request that contains many parameters and parameter values, a different vulnerability than CVE-2011-4858. | ||||
| CVE-2012-1167 | 1 Redhat | 6 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform, Jboss Enterprise Portal Platform and 3 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The JBoss Server in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 5.1.x before 5.1.2 and 5.2.x before 5.2.2, Web Platform before 5.1.2, BRMS Platform before 5.3.0, and SOA Platform before 5.3.0, when the server is configured to use the JaccAuthorizationRealm and the ignoreBaseDecision property is set to true on the JBossWebRealm, does not properly check the permissions created by the WebPermissionMapping class, which allows remote authenticated users to access arbitrary applications. | ||||
| CVE-2011-4610 | 1 Redhat | 6 Jboss Communications Platform, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform and 3 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| JBoss Web, as used in Red Hat JBoss Communications Platform before 5.1.3, Enterprise Web Platform before 5.1.2, Enterprise Application Platform before 5.1.2, and other products, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (infinite loop) via vectors related to a crafted UTF-8 and a "surrogate pair character" that is "at the boundary of an internal buffer." | ||||
| CVE-2012-2379 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 5 Cxf, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform and 2 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Apache CXF 2.4.x before 2.4.8, 2.5.x before 2.5.4, and 2.6.x before 2.6.1, when a Supporting Token specifies a child WS-SecurityPolicy 1.1 or 1.2 policy, does not properly ensure that an XML element is signed or encrypted, which has unspecified impact and attack vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2011-2526 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 9 Tomcat, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Communications Platform and 6 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Apache Tomcat 5.5.x before 5.5.34, 6.x before 6.0.33, and 7.x before 7.0.19, when sendfile is enabled for the HTTP APR or HTTP NIO connector, does not validate certain request attributes, which allows local users to bypass intended file access restrictions or cause a denial of service (infinite loop or JVM crash) by leveraging an untrusted web application. | ||||
| CVE-2011-4314 | 3 Kay Framework Project, Openid, Redhat | 7 Kay Framework, Openid4java, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 4 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| message/ax/AxMessage.java in OpenID4Java before 0.9.6 final, as used in JBoss Enterprise Application Platform 5.1 before 5.1.2, Step2, Kay Framework before 1.0.2, and possibly other products does not verify that Attribute Exchange (AX) information is signed, which allows remote attackers to modify potentially sensitive AX information without detection via a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack. | ||||
| CVE-2022-22965 | 6 Cisco, Oracle, Redhat and 3 more | 45 Cx Cloud Agent, Commerce Platform, Communications Cloud Native Core Automated Test Suite and 42 more | 2025-04-10 | 9.8 Critical |
| A Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux application running on JDK 9+ may be vulnerable to remote code execution (RCE) via data binding. The specific exploit requires the application to run on Tomcat as a WAR deployment. If the application is deployed as a Spring Boot executable jar, i.e. the default, it is not vulnerable to the exploit. However, the nature of the vulnerability is more general, and there may be other ways to exploit it. | ||||
| CVE-2023-6291 | 1 Redhat | 18 Build Keycloak, Enterprise Linux, Jboss Data Grid and 15 more | 2025-04-04 | 7.1 High |
| A flaw was found in the redirect_uri validation logic in Keycloak. This issue may allow a bypass of otherwise explicitly allowed hosts. A successful attack may lead to an access token being stolen, making it possible for the attacker to impersonate other users. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1249 | 1 Redhat | 15 Amq Broker, Amq Streams, Build Keycloak and 12 more | 2025-04-04 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak's OIDC component in the "checkLoginIframe," which allows unvalidated cross-origin messages. This flaw allows attackers to coordinate and send millions of requests in seconds using simple code, significantly impacting the application's availability without proper origin validation for incoming messages. | ||||
| CVE-2019-10173 | 3 Oracle, Redhat, X-stream | 15 Banking Platform, Business Activity Monitoring, Communications Billing And Revenue Management Elastic Charging Engine and 12 more | 2025-04-01 | 9.8 Critical |
| It was found that xstream API version 1.4.10 before 1.4.11 introduced a regression for a previous deserialization flaw. If the security framework has not been initialized, it may allow a remote attacker to run arbitrary shell commands when unmarshalling XML or any supported format. e.g. JSON. (regression of CVE-2013-7285) | ||||
| CVE-2013-7285 | 3 Redhat, X-stream, Xstream Project | 16 Fuse Esb Enterprise, Fuse Management Console, Fuse Mq Enterprise and 13 more | 2025-04-01 | 9.8 Critical |
| Xstream API versions up to 1.4.6 and version 1.4.10, if the security framework has not been initialized, may allow a remote attacker to run arbitrary shell commands by manipulating the processed input stream when unmarshaling XML or any supported format. e.g. JSON. | ||||
| CVE-2023-6717 | 1 Redhat | 15 Amq Broker, Build Keycloak, Jboss Data Grid and 12 more | 2025-03-15 | 6 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the SAML client registration in Keycloak that could allow an administrator to register malicious JavaScript URIs as Assertion Consumer Service POST Binding URLs (ACS), posing a Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) risk. This issue may allow a malicious admin in one realm or a client with registration access to target users in different realms or applications, executing arbitrary JavaScript in their contexts upon form submission. This can enable unauthorized access and harmful actions, compromising the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the complete KC instance. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1132 | 1 Redhat | 13 Amq Broker, Build Keycloak, Jboss Data Grid and 10 more | 2025-03-03 | 8.1 High |
| A flaw was found in Keycloak, where it does not properly validate URLs included in a redirect. This issue could allow an attacker to construct a malicious request to bypass validation and access other URLs and sensitive information within the domain or conduct further attacks. This flaw affects any client that utilizes a wildcard in the Valid Redirect URIs field, and requires user interaction within the malicious URL. | ||||