Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Jboss Fuse
Subscriptions
Total
565 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-1000346 | 3 Bouncycastle, Debian, Redhat | 5 Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api, Debian Linux, Jboss Fuse and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the other party DH public key is not fully validated. This can cause issues as invalid keys can be used to reveal details about the other party's private key where static Diffie-Hellman is in use. As of release 1.56 the key parameters are checked on agreement calculation. | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000345 | 3 Bouncycastle, Debian, Redhat | 5 Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api, Debian Linux, Jboss Fuse and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DHIES/ECIES CBC mode vulnerable to padding oracle attack. For BC 1.55 and older, in an environment where timings can be easily observed, it is possible with enough observations to identify when the decryption is failing due to padding. | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000344 | 2 Bouncycastle, Redhat | 4 Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api, Jboss Fuse, Satellite and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DHIES implementation allowed the use of ECB mode. This mode is regarded as unsafe and support for it has been removed from the provider. | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000343 | 3 Bouncycastle, Debian, Redhat | 5 Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api, Debian Linux, Jboss Fuse and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DSA key pair generator generates a weak private key if used with default values. If the JCA key pair generator is not explicitly initialised with DSA parameters, 1.55 and earlier generates a private value assuming a 1024 bit key size. In earlier releases this can be dealt with by explicitly passing parameters to the key pair generator. | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000342 | 3 Bouncycastle, Debian, Redhat | 5 Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api, Debian Linux, Jboss Fuse and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier ECDSA does not fully validate ASN.1 encoding of signature on verification. It is possible to inject extra elements in the sequence making up the signature and still have it validate, which in some cases may allow the introduction of 'invisible' data into a signed structure. | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000341 | 3 Bouncycastle, Debian, Redhat | 5 Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api, Debian Linux, Jboss Fuse and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier DSA signature generation is vulnerable to timing attack. Where timings can be closely observed for the generation of signatures, the lack of blinding in 1.55, or earlier, may allow an attacker to gain information about the signature's k value and ultimately the private value as well. | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000340 | 2 Bouncycastle, Redhat | 4 Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api, Jboss Fuse, Satellite and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider versions 1.51 to 1.55, a carry propagation bug was introduced in the implementation of squaring for several raw math classes have been fixed (org.bouncycastle.math.raw.Nat???). These classes are used by our custom elliptic curve implementations (org.bouncycastle.math.ec.custom.**), so there was the possibility of rare (in general usage) spurious calculations for elliptic curve scalar multiplications. Such errors would have been detected with high probability by the output validation for our scalar multipliers. | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000339 | 3 Bouncycastle, Debian, Redhat | 5 Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api, Debian Linux, Jboss Fuse and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the primary engine class used for AES was AESFastEngine. Due to the highly table driven approach used in the algorithm it turns out that if the data channel on the CPU can be monitored the lookup table accesses are sufficient to leak information on the AES key being used. There was also a leak in AESEngine although it was substantially less. AESEngine has been modified to remove any signs of leakage (testing carried out on Intel X86-64) and is now the primary AES class for the BC JCE provider from 1.56. Use of AESFastEngine is now only recommended where otherwise deemed appropriate. | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000338 | 4 Bouncycastle, Canonical, Netapp and 1 more | 6 Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api, Ubuntu Linux, 7-mode Transition Tool and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| In Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DSA does not fully validate ASN.1 encoding of signature on verification. It is possible to inject extra elements in the sequence making up the signature and still have it validate, which in some cases may allow the introduction of 'invisible' data into a signed structure. | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000229 | 2 Redhat, Smartbear | 4 Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse, Openshift and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| swagger-ui has XSS in key names | ||||
| CVE-2016-0782 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Activemq, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| The administration web console in Apache ActiveMQ 5.x before 5.11.4, 5.12.x before 5.12.3, and 5.13.x before 5.13.2 allows remote authenticated users to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks and consequently obtain sensitive information from a Java memory dump via vectors related to creating a queue. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0734 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 3 Activemq, Jboss Amq, Jboss Fuse | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| The web-based administration console in Apache ActiveMQ 5.x before 5.13.2 does not send an X-Frame-Options HTTP header, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct clickjacking attacks via a crafted web page that contains a (1) FRAME or (2) IFRAME element. | ||||
| CVE-2015-9251 | 3 Jquery, Oracle, Redhat | 51 Jquery, Agile Product Lifecycle Management For Process, Banking Platform and 48 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| jQuery before 3.0.0 is vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) attacks when a cross-domain Ajax request is performed without the dataType option, causing text/javascript responses to be executed. | ||||
| CVE-2015-7940 | 4 Bouncycastle, Opensuse, Oracle and 1 more | 9 Bouncy Castle Crypto Package, Leap, Opensuse and 6 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| The Bouncy Castle Java library before 1.51 does not validate a point is withing the elliptic curve, which makes it easier for remote attackers to obtain private keys via a series of crafted elliptic curve Diffie Hellman (ECDH) key exchanges, aka an "invalid curve attack." | ||||
| CVE-2015-7559 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 4 Activemq, Jboss A-mq, Jboss Amq and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 2.7 Low |
| It was found that the Apache ActiveMQ client before 5.14.5 exposed a remote shutdown command in the ActiveMQConnection class. An attacker logged into a compromised broker could use this flaw to achieve denial of service on a connected client. | ||||
| CVE-2015-7501 | 1 Redhat | 22 Data Grid, Enterprise Linux, Jboss A-mq and 19 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Red Hat JBoss A-MQ 6.x; BPM Suite (BPMS) 6.x; BRMS 6.x and 5.x; Data Grid (JDG) 6.x; Data Virtualization (JDV) 6.x and 5.x; Enterprise Application Platform 6.x, 5.x, and 4.3.x; Fuse 6.x; Fuse Service Works (FSW) 6.x; Operations Network (JBoss ON) 3.x; Portal 6.x; SOA Platform (SOA-P) 5.x; Web Server (JWS) 3.x; Red Hat OpenShift/xPAAS 3.x; and Red Hat Subscription Asset Manager 1.3 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object, related to the Apache Commons Collections (ACC) library. | ||||
| CVE-2015-6644 | 2 Google, Redhat | 6 Android, Jboss Amq, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Bouncy Castle in Android before 5.1.1 LMY49F and 6.0 before 2016-01-01 allows attackers to obtain sensitive information via a crafted application, aka internal bug 24106146. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5348 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Camel, Jboss Fuse | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Apache Camel 2.6.x through 2.14.x, 2.15.x before 2.15.5, and 2.16.x before 2.16.1, when using (1) camel-jetty or (2) camel-servlet as a consumer in Camel routes, allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object in an HTTP request. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5344 | 2 Apache, Redhat | 2 Camel, Jboss Fuse | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| The camel-xstream component in Apache Camel before 2.15.5 and 2.16.x before 2.16.1 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted serialized Java object in an HTTP request. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5254 | 3 Apache, Fedoraproject, Redhat | 5 Activemq, Fedora, Jboss Amq and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Apache ActiveMQ 5.x before 5.13.0 does not restrict the classes that can be serialized in the broker, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted serialized Java Message Service (JMS) ObjectMessage object. | ||||