Filtered by vendor Redhat
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Satellite
Subscriptions
Total
536 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2016-1000344 | 2 Bouncycastle, Redhat | 4 Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api, Jboss Fuse, Satellite and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DHIES implementation allowed the use of ECB mode. This mode is regarded as unsafe and support for it has been removed from the provider. | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000343 | 3 Bouncycastle, Debian, Redhat | 5 Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api, Debian Linux, Jboss Fuse and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DSA key pair generator generates a weak private key if used with default values. If the JCA key pair generator is not explicitly initialised with DSA parameters, 1.55 and earlier generates a private value assuming a 1024 bit key size. In earlier releases this can be dealt with by explicitly passing parameters to the key pair generator. | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000342 | 3 Bouncycastle, Debian, Redhat | 5 Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api, Debian Linux, Jboss Fuse and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier ECDSA does not fully validate ASN.1 encoding of signature on verification. It is possible to inject extra elements in the sequence making up the signature and still have it validate, which in some cases may allow the introduction of 'invisible' data into a signed structure. | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000341 | 3 Bouncycastle, Debian, Redhat | 5 Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api, Debian Linux, Jboss Fuse and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier DSA signature generation is vulnerable to timing attack. Where timings can be closely observed for the generation of signatures, the lack of blinding in 1.55, or earlier, may allow an attacker to gain information about the signature's k value and ultimately the private value as well. | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000340 | 2 Bouncycastle, Redhat | 4 Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api, Jboss Fuse, Satellite and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider versions 1.51 to 1.55, a carry propagation bug was introduced in the implementation of squaring for several raw math classes have been fixed (org.bouncycastle.math.raw.Nat???). These classes are used by our custom elliptic curve implementations (org.bouncycastle.math.ec.custom.**), so there was the possibility of rare (in general usage) spurious calculations for elliptic curve scalar multiplications. Such errors would have been detected with high probability by the output validation for our scalar multipliers. | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000339 | 3 Bouncycastle, Debian, Redhat | 5 Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api, Debian Linux, Jboss Fuse and 2 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| In the Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the primary engine class used for AES was AESFastEngine. Due to the highly table driven approach used in the algorithm it turns out that if the data channel on the CPU can be monitored the lookup table accesses are sufficient to leak information on the AES key being used. There was also a leak in AESEngine although it was substantially less. AESEngine has been modified to remove any signs of leakage (testing carried out on Intel X86-64) and is now the primary AES class for the BC JCE provider from 1.56. Use of AESFastEngine is now only recommended where otherwise deemed appropriate. | ||||
| CVE-2016-1000338 | 4 Bouncycastle, Canonical, Netapp and 1 more | 6 Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api, Ubuntu Linux, 7-mode Transition Tool and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| In Bouncy Castle JCE Provider version 1.55 and earlier the DSA does not fully validate ASN.1 encoding of signature on verification. It is possible to inject extra elements in the sequence making up the signature and still have it validate, which in some cases may allow the introduction of 'invisible' data into a signed structure. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0376 | 3 Ibm, Novell, Redhat | 15 Java Sdk, Suse Linux Enterprise Module For Legacy Software, Suse Linux Enterprise Server and 12 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| The com.ibm.rmi.io.SunSerializableFactory class in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 6 before SR16 FP25 (6.0.16.25), 6 R1 before SR8 FP25 (6.1.8.25), 7 before SR9 FP40 (7.0.9.40), 7 R1 before SR3 FP40 (7.1.3.40), and 8 before SR3 (8.0.3.0) does not properly deserialize classes in an AccessController doPrivileged block, which allows remote attackers to bypass a sandbox protection mechanism and execute arbitrary code as demonstrated by the readValue method of the com.ibm.rmi.io.ValueHandlerPool.ValueHandlerSingleton class, which implements the javax.rmi.CORBA.ValueHandler interface. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2013-5456. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0363 | 3 Ibm, Novell, Redhat | 15 Java Sdk, Suse Linux Enterprise Module For Legacy Software, Suse Linux Enterprise Server and 12 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| The com.ibm.CORBA.iiop.ClientDelegate class in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 6 before SR16 FP25 (6.0.16.25), 6 R1 before SR8 FP25 (6.1.8.25), 7 before SR9 FP40 (7.0.9.40), 7 R1 before SR3 FP40 (7.1.3.40), and 8 before SR3 (8.0.3.0) uses the invoke method of the java.lang.reflect.Method class in an AccessController doPrivileged block, which allows remote attackers to call setSecurityManager and bypass a sandbox protection mechanism via vectors related to a Proxy object instance implementing the java.lang.reflect.InvocationHandler interface. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2013-3009. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0264 | 3 Ibm, Redhat, Suse | 15 Java Sdk, Enterprise Linux Desktop, Enterprise Linux Hpc Node Supplementary and 12 more | 2024-11-21 | 5.6 Medium |
| Buffer overflow in the Java Virtual Machine (JVM) in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 6 before SR16 FP25 (6.0.16.25), 6 R1 before SR8 FP25 (6.1.8.25), 7 before SR9 FP40 (7.0.9.40), 7 R1 before SR3 FP40 (7.1.3.40), and 8 before SR3 (8.0.3.0) allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2015-8126 | 9 Apple, Canonical, Debian and 6 more | 24 Mac Os X, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 21 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Multiple buffer overflows in the (1) png_set_PLTE and (2) png_get_PLTE functions in libpng before 1.0.64, 1.1.x and 1.2.x before 1.2.54, 1.3.x and 1.4.x before 1.4.17, 1.5.x before 1.5.24, and 1.6.x before 1.6.19 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application crash) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a small bit-depth value in an IHDR (aka image header) chunk in a PNG image. | ||||
| CVE-2015-7518 | 2 Redhat, Theforeman | 3 Satellite, Satellite Capsule, Foreman | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in information popups in Foreman before 1.10.0 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via (1) global parameters, (2) smart class parameters, or (3) smart variables in the (a) host or (b) hostgroup edit forms. | ||||
| CVE-2015-6644 | 2 Google, Redhat | 6 Android, Jboss Amq, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 3 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Bouncy Castle in Android before 5.1.1 LMY49F and 6.0 before 2016-01-01 allows attackers to obtain sensitive information via a crafted application, aka internal bug 24106146. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5282 | 2 Redhat, Theforeman | 3 Satellite, Satellite Capsule, Foreman | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Foreman 1.7.0 and after. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5233 | 2 Redhat, Theforeman | 3 Satellite, Satellite Capsule, Foreman | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Foreman before 1.8.4 and 1.9.x before 1.9.1 do not properly apply view_hosts permissions, which allows (1) remote authenticated users with the view_reports permission to read reports from arbitrary hosts or (2) remote authenticated users with the destroy_reports permission to delete reports from arbitrary hosts via direct access to the (a) individual report show/delete pages or (b) APIs. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5164 | 2 Pulpproject, Redhat | 2 Qpid, Satellite | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| The Qpid server on Red Hat Satellite 6 does not properly restrict message types, which allows remote authenticated users with administrative access on a managed content host to execute arbitrary code via a crafted message, related to a pickle processing problem in pulp. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5152 | 2 Redhat, Theforeman | 3 Satellite, Satellite Capsule, Foreman | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| Foreman after 1.1 and before 1.9.0-RC1 does not redirect HTTP requests to HTTPS when the require_ssl setting is set to true, which allows remote attackers to obtain user credentials via a man-in-the-middle attack. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5041 | 3 Ibm, Redhat, Suse | 8 Java Sdk, Websphere Application Server, Network Satellite and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| The J9 JVM in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 6 before SR16 FP20, 6 R1 before SR8 FP20, 7 before SR9 FP30, and 7 R1 before SR3 FP30 allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information or inject data by invoking non-public interface methods. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5006 | 3 Ibm, Redhat, Suse | 11 Java 2 Sdk, Java Sdk, Enterprise Linux Desktop and 8 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| IBM Java Security Components in IBM SDK, Java Technology Edition 8 before SR2, 7 R1 before SR3 FP20, 7 before SR9 FP20, 6 R1 before SR8 FP15, and 6 before SR16 FP15 allow physically proximate attackers to obtain sensitive information by reading the Kerberos Credential Cache. | ||||
| CVE-2015-3448 | 2 Redhat, Rest-client Project | 4 Cloudforms Managementengine, Satellite, Satellite Capsule and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | N/A |
| REST client for Ruby (aka rest-client) before 1.7.3 logs usernames and passwords, which allows local users to obtain sensitive information by reading the log. | ||||