Total
524 CVE
CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
---|---|---|---|---|
CVE-2021-37127 | 1 Huawei | 4 Imanager Neteco, Imanager Neteco 6000, Imanager Neteco 6000 Firmware and 1 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 High |
There is a signature management vulnerability in some huawei products. An attacker can forge signature and bypass the signature check. During firmware update process, successful exploit this vulnerability can cause the forged system file overwrite the correct system file. Affected product versions include:iManager NetEco V600R010C00CP2001,V600R010C00CP2002,V600R010C00SPC100,V600R010C00SPC110,V600R010C00SPC120,V600R010C00SPC200,V600R010C00SPC210,V600R010C00SPC300;iManager NetEco 6000 V600R009C00SPC100,V600R009C00SPC110,V600R009C00SPC120,V600R009C00SPC190,V600R009C00SPC200,V600R009C00SPC201,V600R009C00SPC202,V600R009C00SPC210. | ||||
CVE-2021-36277 | 1 Dell | 3 Alienware Command Center Application, Command \| Update, Update\/alienware Update | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
Dell Command | Update, Dell Update, and Alienware Update versions before 4.3 contains an Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature Vulnerability. A local authenticated malicious user may exploit this vulnerability by executing arbitrary code on the system. | ||||
CVE-2021-35113 | 1 Qualcomm | 96 Aqt1000, Aqt1000 Firmware, Csrb31024 and 93 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.3 High |
Possible authentication bypass due to improper order of signature verification and hashing in the signature verification call in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Wearables | ||||
CVE-2021-35097 | 1 Qualcomm | 258 Aqt1000, Aqt1000 Firmware, Ar8031 and 255 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.3 High |
Possible authentication bypass due to improper order of signature verification and hashing in the signature verification call in Snapdragon Auto, Snapdragon Compute, Snapdragon Connectivity, Snapdragon Consumer IOT, Snapdragon Industrial IOT, Snapdragon Mobile, Snapdragon Voice & Music, Snapdragon Wearables | ||||
CVE-2021-35039 | 2 Debian, Linux | 2 Debian Linux, Linux Kernel | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
kernel/module.c in the Linux kernel before 5.12.14 mishandles Signature Verification, aka CID-0c18f29aae7c. Without CONFIG_MODULE_SIG, verification that a kernel module is signed, for loading via init_module, does not occur for a module.sig_enforce=1 command-line argument. | ||||
CVE-2021-34715 | 1 Cisco | 2 Expressway, Telepresence Video Communication Server | 2024-11-21 | 4.7 Medium |
A vulnerability in the image verification function of Cisco Expressway Series and Cisco TelePresence Video Communication Server (VCS) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute code with internal user privileges on the underlying operating system. The vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of the content of upgrade packages. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by uploading a malicious archive to the Upgrade page of the administrative web interface. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute code with user-level privileges (the _nobody account) on the underlying operating system. | ||||
CVE-2021-34709 | 1 Cisco | 23 8101-32fh, 8101-32h, 8102-64h and 20 more | 2024-11-21 | 6 Medium |
Multiple vulnerabilities in image verification checks of Cisco Network Convergence System (NCS) 540 Series Routers, only when running Cisco IOS XR NCS540L software images, and Cisco IOS XR Software for Cisco 8000 Series Routers could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary code on the underlying operating system. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. | ||||
CVE-2021-34708 | 1 Cisco | 23 8101-32fh, 8101-32h, 8102-64h and 20 more | 2024-11-21 | 6 Medium |
Multiple vulnerabilities in image verification checks of Cisco Network Convergence System (NCS) 540 Series Routers, only when running Cisco IOS XR NCS540L software images, and Cisco IOS XR Software for Cisco 8000 Series Routers could allow an authenticated, local attacker to execute arbitrary code on the underlying operating system. For more information about these vulnerabilities, see the Details section of this advisory. | ||||
CVE-2021-34433 | 1 Eclipse | 1 Californium | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
In Eclipse Californium version 2.0.0 to 2.6.4 and 3.0.0-M1 to 3.0.0-M3, the certificate based (x509 and RPK) DTLS handshakes accidentally succeeds without verifying the server side's signature on the client side, if that signature is not included in the server's ServerKeyExchange. | ||||
CVE-2021-34420 | 1 Zoom | 1 Zoom Client For Meetings | 2024-11-21 | 4.7 Medium |
The Zoom Client for Meetings for Windows installer before version 5.5.4 does not properly verify the signature of files with .msi, .ps1, and .bat extensions. This could lead to a malicious actor installing malicious software on a customer’s computer. | ||||
CVE-2021-33885 | 1 Bbraun | 3 Infusomat Large Volume Pump 871305u, Spacecom2, Spacestation 8713142u | 2024-11-21 | 10 Critical |
An Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability in B. Braun SpaceCom2 prior to 012U000062 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to send the device malicious data that will be used in place of the correct data. This results in full system command access and execution because of the lack of cryptographic signatures on critical data sets. | ||||
CVE-2021-33054 | 2 Debian, Inverse | 2 Debian Linux, Sogo | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
SOGo 2.x before 2.4.1 and 3.x through 5.x before 5.1.1 does not validate the signatures of any SAML assertions it receives. Any actor with network access to the deployment could impersonate users when SAML is the authentication method. (Only versions after 2.0.5a are affected.) | ||||
CVE-2021-32738 | 1 Stellar | 1 Js-stellar-sdk | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
js-stellar-sdk is a Javascript library for communicating with a Stellar Horizon server. The `Utils.readChallengeTx` function used in SEP-10 Stellar Web Authentication states in its function documentation that it reads and validates the challenge transaction including verifying that the `serverAccountID` has signed the transaction. In js-stellar-sdk before version 8.2.3, the function does not verify that the server has signed the transaction. Applications that also used `Utils.verifyChallengeTxThreshold` or `Utils.verifyChallengeTxSigners` to verify the signatures including the server signature on the challenge transaction are unaffected as those functions verify the server signed the transaction. Applications calling `Utils.readChallengeTx` should update to version 8.2.3, the first version with a patch for this vulnerability, to ensure that the challenge transaction is completely valid and signed by the server creating the challenge transaction. | ||||
CVE-2021-32685 | 1 Togatech | 1 Tenvoy | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
tEnvoy contains the PGP, NaCl, and PBKDF2 in node.js and the browser (hashing, random, encryption, decryption, signatures, conversions), used by TogaTech.org. In versions prior to 7.0.3, the `verifyWithMessage` method of `tEnvoyNaClSigningKey` always returns `true` for any signature that has a SHA-512 hash matching the SHA-512 hash of the message even if the signature was invalid. This issue is patched in version 7.0.3. As a workaround: In `tenvoy.js` under the `verifyWithMessage` method definition within the `tEnvoyNaClSigningKey` class, ensure that the return statement call to `this.verify` ends in `.verified`. | ||||
CVE-2021-31847 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Agent | 2024-11-21 | 8.2 High |
Improper access control vulnerability in the repair process for McAfee Agent for Windows prior to 5.7.4 could allow a local attacker to perform a DLL preloading attack using unsigned DLLs. This would result in elevation of privileges and the ability to execute arbitrary code as the system user, through not correctly protecting a temporary directory used in the repair process and not checking the DLL signature. | ||||
CVE-2021-31841 | 1 Mcafee | 1 Mcafee Agent | 2024-11-21 | 8.2 High |
A DLL sideloading vulnerability in McAfee Agent for Windows prior to 5.7.4 could allow a local user to perform a DLL sideloading attack with an unsigned DLL with a specific name and in a specific location. This would result in the user gaining elevated permissions and the ability to execute arbitrary code as the system user, through not checking the DLL signature. | ||||
CVE-2021-30246 | 1 Jsrsasign Project | 1 Jsrsasign | 2024-11-21 | 9.1 Critical |
In the jsrsasign package through 10.1.13 for Node.js, some invalid RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signatures are mistakenly recognized to be valid. NOTE: there is no known practical attack. | ||||
CVE-2021-30130 | 2 Debian, Phpseclib | 2 Debian Linux, Phpseclib | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
phpseclib before 2.0.31 and 3.x before 3.0.7 mishandles RSA PKCS#1 v1.5 signature verification. | ||||
CVE-2021-30066 | 2 Belden, Schneider-electric | 26 Eagle 20 Tofino 943 987-501-tx\/tx, Eagle 20 Tofino 943 987-501-tx\/tx Firmware, Eagle 20 Tofino 943 987-502 -tx\/mm and 23 more | 2024-11-21 | 6.8 Medium |
On Schneider Electric ConneXium Tofino Firewall TCSEFEA23F3F22 before 03.23, TCSEFEA23F3F20/21, and Belden Tofino Xenon Security Appliance, an arbitrary firmware image can be loaded because firmware signature verification (for a USB stick) can be bypassed. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix of CVE-2017-11400. | ||||
CVE-2021-2369 | 3 Debian, Oracle, Redhat | 8 Debian Linux, Graalvm, Java Se and 5 more | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
Vulnerability in the Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition product of Oracle Java SE (component: Library). Supported versions that are affected are Java SE: 7u301, 8u291, 11.0.11, 16.0.1; Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition: 20.3.2 and 21.1.0. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via multiple protocols to compromise Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Java SE, Oracle GraalVM Enterprise Edition accessible data. Note: This vulnerability applies to Java deployments, typically in clients running sandboxed Java Web Start applications or sandboxed Java applets, that load and run untrusted code (e.g., code that comes from the internet) and rely on the Java sandbox for security. This vulnerability does not apply to Java deployments, typically in servers, that load and run only trusted code (e.g., code installed by an administrator). CVSS 3.1 Base Score 4.3 (Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N). |