| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A Local File Inclusion (LFI) vulnerability exists in the '/reinstall_extension' endpoint of the parisneo/lollms-webui application, specifically within the `name` parameter of the `@router.post("/reinstall_extension")` route. This vulnerability allows attackers to inject a malicious `name` parameter, leading to the server loading and executing arbitrary Python files from the upload directory for discussions. This issue arises due to the concatenation of `data.name` directly with `lollmsElfServer.lollms_paths.extensions_zoo_path` and its use as an argument for `ExtensionBuilder().build_extension()`. The server's handling of the `__init__.py` file in arbitrary locations, facilitated by `importlib.machinery.SourceFileLoader`, enables the execution of arbitrary code, such as command execution or creating a reverse-shell connection. This vulnerability affects the latest version of parisneo/lollms-webui and can lead to Remote Code Execution (RCE) when the application is exposed to an external endpoint or the UI, especially when bound to `0.0.0.0` or in `headless mode`. No user interaction is required for exploitation. |
| CVE-2024-4320 describes a vulnerability in the parisneo/lollms software, specifically within the `ExtensionBuilder().build_extension()` function. The vulnerability arises from the `/mount_extension` endpoint, where a path traversal issue allows attackers to navigate beyond the intended directory structure. This is facilitated by the `data.category` and `data.folder` parameters accepting empty strings (`""`), which, due to inadequate input sanitization, can lead to the construction of a `package_path` that points to the root directory. Consequently, if an attacker can create a `config.yaml` file in a controllable path, this path can be appended to the `extensions` list and trigger the execution of `__init__.py` in the current directory, leading to remote code execution. The vulnerability affects versions up to 5.9.0, and has been addressed in version 9.8. |
| Vela is a Pipeline Automation (CI/CD) framework built on Linux container technology written in Golang. Prior to versions 0.25.3 and 0.26.3, by spoofing a webhook payload with a specific set of headers and body data, an attacker could transfer ownership of a repository and its repo level secrets to a separate repository. These secrets could be exfiltrated by follow up builds to the repository. Users with an enabled repository with access to repo level CI secrets in Vela are vulnerable to the exploit, and any user with access to the CI instance and the linked source control manager can perform the exploit. Versions 0.25.3 and 0.26.3 fix the issue. No known workarounds are available. |
| Issue summary: Clients using RFC7250 Raw Public Keys (RPKs) to authenticate a
server may fail to notice that the server was not authenticated, because
handshakes don't abort as expected when the SSL_VERIFY_PEER verification mode
is set.
Impact summary: TLS and DTLS connections using raw public keys may be
vulnerable to man-in-middle attacks when server authentication failure is not
detected by clients.
RPKs are disabled by default in both TLS clients and TLS servers. The issue
only arises when TLS clients explicitly enable RPK use by the server, and the
server, likewise, enables sending of an RPK instead of an X.509 certificate
chain. The affected clients are those that then rely on the handshake to
fail when the server's RPK fails to match one of the expected public keys,
by setting the verification mode to SSL_VERIFY_PEER.
Clients that enable server-side raw public keys can still find out that raw
public key verification failed by calling SSL_get_verify_result(), and those
that do, and take appropriate action, are not affected. This issue was
introduced in the initial implementation of RPK support in OpenSSL 3.2.
The FIPS modules in 3.4, 3.3, 3.2, 3.1 and 3.0 are not affected by this issue. |
| Collabora Online is a collaborative online office suite based on LibreOffice. In affected versions of Collabora Online, https connections from coolwsd to other hosts may incompletely verify the remote host's certificate's against the full chain of trust. This vulnerability is fixed in Collabora Online 24.04.4.3, 23.05.14.1, and 22.05.23.1. |
| A cryptographic authentication bypass vulnerability exists in OneLogin AD Connector prior to 6.1.5 due to the exposure of a tenant’s SSO JWT signing key via the /api/adc/v4/configuration endpoint. An attacker in possession of the signing key can craft valid JWT tokens impersonating arbitrary users within a OneLogin tenant. The tokens allow authentication to the OneLogin SSO portal and all downstream applications federated via SAML or OIDC. This allows full unauthorized access across the victim’s SaaS environment. |
| The HttpAuth plugin in pGina.Fork through 3.9.9.12 allows authentication bypass when an adversary controls DNS resolution for pginaloginserver. |
| Agent Dart is an agent library built for Internet Computer for Dart and Flutter apps. Prior to version 1.0.0-dev.29, certificate verification in `lib/agent/certificate.dart` does not occur properly. During the delegation verification in the `_checkDelegation` function, the canister_ranges aren't verified. The impact of not checking the canister_ranges is that a subnet can sign canister responses in behalf of another subnet. The certificate’s timestamp, i.e /time path, is also not verified, meaning that the certificate effectively has no expiration time. Version 1.0.0-dev.29 implements appropriate certificate verification. |
| Improper Certificate Validation (CWE-295) in the Gallagher Command Centre SALTO integration allowed an attacker to spoof the SALTO server.
This issue affects all versions of Gallagher Command Centre prior to 9.20.1043. |
| Mengshen Wireless Door Alarm M70 2024-05-24 allows Authentication Bypass via a Capture-Replay approach. |
| An issue was discovered on certain Nuki Home Solutions devices. Lack of certificate validation on HTTP communications allows attackers to intercept and tamper data. This affects Nuki Smart Lock 3.0 before 3.3.5, Nuki Bridge v1 before 1.22.0 and Nuki Bridge v2 before 2.13.2. |
| When deploying Cloud Foundry together with the haproxy-boshrelease and using a non default configuration, it might be possible to craft HTTP requests that bypass mTLS authentication to Cloud Foundry applications.
You are affected if you have route-services enabled in routing-release and have configured the haproxy-boshrelease property “ha_proxy.forwarded_client_cert” to “forward_only_if_route_service”. |
| scratch-coding-hut.github.io is the website for Coding Hut. In 1.0-beta3 and earlier, the login link can be used to login to any account by changing the username in the username field. |
| An insufficient certificate validation issue in the Palo Alto Networks GlobalProtect™ app enables attackers to connect the GlobalProtect app to arbitrary servers. This can enable a local non-administrative operating system user or an attacker on the same subnet to install malicious root certificates on the endpoint and subsequently install malicious software signed by the malicious root certificates on that endpoint. |
| An issue was discovered in Ada Web Server 20.0. When configured to use SSL (which is not the default setting), the SSL/TLS used to establish connections to external services is done without proper hostname validation. This is exploitable by man-in-the-middle attackers. |
| Oqtane Framework 6.0.0 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. By manipulating the entityid parameter, attackers can bypass passcode validation and successfully log into the application or access restricted data without proper authorization. The lack of server-side validation exacerbates the issue, as the application relies on client-side information for authentication. |
| Authentication Bypass by Spoofing vulnerability in Pippin Williamson CGC Maintenance Mode allows Functionality Bypass.This issue affects CGC Maintenance Mode: from n/a through 1.2. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE W1748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GY01-0AA0), SCALANCE W1748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GY01-0TA0), SCALANCE W1788-1 M12 (6GK5788-1GY01-0AA0), SCALANCE W1788-2 EEC M12 (6GK5788-2GY01-0TA0), SCALANCE W1788-2 M12 (6GK5788-2GY01-0AA0), SCALANCE W1788-2IA M12 (6GK5788-2HY01-0AA0), SCALANCE W721-1 RJ45 (6GK5721-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W721-1 RJ45 (6GK5721-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AC0), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AA0), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AA6), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AB0), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (USA) (6GK5734-1FX00-0AB6), SCALANCE W738-1 M12 (6GK5738-1GY00-0AA0), SCALANCE W738-1 M12 (6GK5738-1GY00-0AB0), SCALANCE W748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GD00-0AA0), SCALANCE W748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GD00-0AB0), SCALANCE W748-1 RJ45 (6GK5748-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W748-1 RJ45 (6GK5748-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W761-1 RJ45 (6GK5761-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W761-1 RJ45 (6GK5761-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W774-1 M12 EEC (6GK5774-1FY00-0TA0), SCALANCE W774-1 M12 EEC (6GK5774-1FY00-0TB0), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AA0), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AA6), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AB0), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AC0), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (USA) (6GK5774-1FX00-0AB6), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 (6GK5778-1GY00-0AA0), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 (6GK5778-1GY00-0AB0), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 EEC (6GK5778-1GY00-0TA0), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 EEC (USA) (6GK5778-1GY00-0TB0), SCALANCE W786-1 RJ45 (6GK5786-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W786-1 RJ45 (6GK5786-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45 (6GK5786-2FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45 (6GK5786-2FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45 (6GK5786-2FC00-0AC0), SCALANCE W786-2 SFP (6GK5786-2FE00-0AA0), SCALANCE W786-2 SFP (6GK5786-2FE00-0AB0), SCALANCE W786-2IA RJ45 (6GK5786-2HC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W786-2IA RJ45 (6GK5786-2HC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-1 M12 (6GK5788-1GD00-0AA0), SCALANCE W788-1 M12 (6GK5788-1GD00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-1 RJ45 (6GK5788-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W788-1 RJ45 (6GK5788-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 (6GK5788-2GD00-0AA0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 (6GK5788-2GD00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EEC (6GK5788-2GD00-0TA0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EEC (6GK5788-2GD00-0TB0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EEC (6GK5788-2GD00-0TC0), SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45 (6GK5788-2FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45 (6GK5788-2FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45 (6GK5788-2FC00-0AC0), SCALANCE WAM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-7DA0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 (EU) (6GK5766-1GE00-7DA0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 (US) (6GK5766-1GE00-7DB0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 EEC (EU) (6GK5766-1GE00-7TA0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 EEC (US) (6GK5766-1GE00-7TB0), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-3AA0), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-3DA0), SCALANCE WUM766-1 (EU) (6GK5766-1GE00-3DA0), SCALANCE WUM766-1 (US) (6GK5766-1GE00-3DB0). This CVE refers to Scenario 3 "Override client’s security context" of CVE-2022-47522.
Affected devices can be tricked into associating a newly negotiated, attacker-controlled, security context with frames belonging to a victim. This could allow a physically proximate attacker to decrypt frames meant for the victim. |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SCALANCE W1748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GY01-0AA0), SCALANCE W1748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GY01-0TA0), SCALANCE W1788-1 M12 (6GK5788-1GY01-0AA0), SCALANCE W1788-2 EEC M12 (6GK5788-2GY01-0TA0), SCALANCE W1788-2 M12 (6GK5788-2GY01-0AA0), SCALANCE W1788-2IA M12 (6GK5788-2HY01-0AA0), SCALANCE W721-1 RJ45 (6GK5721-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W721-1 RJ45 (6GK5721-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W722-1 RJ45 (6GK5722-1FC00-0AC0), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AA0), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AA6), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (6GK5734-1FX00-0AB0), SCALANCE W734-1 RJ45 (USA) (6GK5734-1FX00-0AB6), SCALANCE W738-1 M12 (6GK5738-1GY00-0AA0), SCALANCE W738-1 M12 (6GK5738-1GY00-0AB0), SCALANCE W748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GD00-0AA0), SCALANCE W748-1 M12 (6GK5748-1GD00-0AB0), SCALANCE W748-1 RJ45 (6GK5748-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W748-1 RJ45 (6GK5748-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W761-1 RJ45 (6GK5761-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W761-1 RJ45 (6GK5761-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W774-1 M12 EEC (6GK5774-1FY00-0TA0), SCALANCE W774-1 M12 EEC (6GK5774-1FY00-0TB0), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AA0), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AA6), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AB0), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (6GK5774-1FX00-0AC0), SCALANCE W774-1 RJ45 (USA) (6GK5774-1FX00-0AB6), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 (6GK5778-1GY00-0AA0), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 (6GK5778-1GY00-0AB0), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 EEC (6GK5778-1GY00-0TA0), SCALANCE W778-1 M12 EEC (USA) (6GK5778-1GY00-0TB0), SCALANCE W786-1 RJ45 (6GK5786-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W786-1 RJ45 (6GK5786-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45 (6GK5786-2FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45 (6GK5786-2FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W786-2 RJ45 (6GK5786-2FC00-0AC0), SCALANCE W786-2 SFP (6GK5786-2FE00-0AA0), SCALANCE W786-2 SFP (6GK5786-2FE00-0AB0), SCALANCE W786-2IA RJ45 (6GK5786-2HC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W786-2IA RJ45 (6GK5786-2HC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-1 M12 (6GK5788-1GD00-0AA0), SCALANCE W788-1 M12 (6GK5788-1GD00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-1 RJ45 (6GK5788-1FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W788-1 RJ45 (6GK5788-1FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 (6GK5788-2GD00-0AA0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 (6GK5788-2GD00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EEC (6GK5788-2GD00-0TA0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EEC (6GK5788-2GD00-0TB0), SCALANCE W788-2 M12 EEC (6GK5788-2GD00-0TC0), SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45 (6GK5788-2FC00-0AA0), SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45 (6GK5788-2FC00-0AB0), SCALANCE W788-2 RJ45 (6GK5788-2FC00-0AC0), SCALANCE WAM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-7DA0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 (EU) (6GK5766-1GE00-7DA0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 (US) (6GK5766-1GE00-7DB0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 EEC (EU) (6GK5766-1GE00-7TA0), SCALANCE WAM766-1 EEC (US) (6GK5766-1GE00-7TB0), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-3AA0), SCALANCE WUM763-1 (6GK5763-1AL00-3DA0), SCALANCE WUM766-1 (EU) (6GK5766-1GE00-3DA0), SCALANCE WUM766-1 (US) (6GK5766-1GE00-3DB0). This CVE refers to Scenario 2 "Abuse the queue for network disruptions" of CVE-2022-47522.
Affected devices can be tricked into enabling its power-saving mechanisms for a victim client. This could allow a physically proximate attacker to execute disconnection and denial-of-service attacks. |
| The affected devices do not validate the server certificate when connecting to the SolaX Cloud MQTTS server hosted in the Alibaba Cloud (mqtt001.solaxcloud.com, TCP 8883). This allows attackers in a man-in-the-middle position to act as the legitimate MQTT server and issue arbitrary commands to devices. |
