Total
524 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2023-49079 | 1 Misskey | 1 Misskey | 2024-11-21 | 9.3 Critical |
| Misskey is an open source, decentralized social media platform. Misskey's missing signature validation allows arbitrary users to impersonate any remote user. This issue has been patched in version 2023.11.1-beta.1. | ||||
| CVE-2023-47122 | 1 Sigstore | 1 Gitsign | 2024-11-21 | 4.2 Medium |
| Gitsign is software for keyless Git signing using Sigstore. In versions of gitsign starting with 0.6.0 and prior to 0.8.0, Rekor public keys were fetched via the Rekor API, instead of through the local TUF client. If the upstream Rekor server happened to be compromised, gitsign clients could potentially be tricked into trusting incorrect signatures. There is no known compromise the default public good instance (`rekor.sigstore.dev`) - anyone using this instance is unaffected. This issue was fixed in v0.8.0. No known workarounds are available. | ||||
| CVE-2023-46324 | 2 Free5gc, Golang | 2 Udm, Go | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| pkg/suci/suci.go in free5GC udm before 1.2.0, when Go before 1.19 is used, allows an Invalid Curve Attack because it may compute a shared secret via an uncompressed public key that has not been validated. An attacker can send arbitrary SUCIs to the UDM, which tries to decrypt them via both its private key and the attacker's public key. | ||||
| CVE-2023-44077 | 2 Apple, Studionetworksolutions | 2 Macos, Sharebrowser | 2024-11-21 | 9.8 Critical |
| Studio Network Solutions ShareBrowser before 7.0 on macOS mishandles signature verification, aka PMP-2636. | ||||
| CVE-2023-43660 | 1 Warpgate Project | 1 Warpgate | 2024-11-21 | 4.8 Medium |
| Warpgate is a smart SSH, HTTPS and MySQL bastion host for Linux that doesn't need special client apps. The SSH key verification for a user can be bypassed by sending an SSH key offer without a signature. This allows bypassing authentication under following conditions: 1. The attacker knows the username and a valid target name 2. The attacked knows the user's public key and 3. Only SSH public key authentication is required for the user account. This issue has been addressed in version 0.8.1. Users are advised to upgrade. There are no known workarounds for this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2023-43611 | 2 Apple, F5 | 21 Macos, Big-ip Access Policy Manager, Big-ip Advanced Firewall Manager and 18 more | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| The BIG-IP Edge Client Installer on macOS does not follow best practices for elevating privileges during the installation process. This vulnerability is due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2023-38418. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated | ||||
| CVE-2023-42806 | 1 Iohk | 1 Hydra | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Hydra is the layer-two scalability solution for Cardano. Prior to version 0.13.0, not signing and verifying `$\mathsf{cid}$` allows an attacker (which must be a participant of this head) to use a snapshot from an old head instance with the same participants to close the head or contest the state with it. This can lead to an incorrect distribution of value (= value extraction attack; hard, but possible) or prevent the head to finalize because the value available is not consistent with the closed utxo state (= denial of service; easy). A patch is planned for version 0.13.0. As a workaround, rotate keys between heads so not to re-use keys and not result in the same multi-signature participants. | ||||
| CVE-2023-41744 | 2 Acronis, Apple | 3 Agent, Cyber Protect, Macos | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| Local privilege escalation due to unrestricted loading of unsigned libraries. The following products are affected: Acronis Agent (macOS) before build 30600, Acronis Cyber Protect 15 (macOS) before build 35979. | ||||
| CVE-2023-41337 | 1 Dena | 1 H2o | 2024-11-21 | 6.1 Medium |
| h2o is an HTTP server with support for HTTP/1.x, HTTP/2 and HTTP/3. In version 2.3.0-beta2 and prior, when h2o is configured to listen to multiple addresses or ports with each of them using different backend servers managed by multiple entities, a malicious backend entity that also has the opportunity to observe or inject packets exchanged between the client and h2o may misdirect HTTPS requests going to other backends and observe the contents of that HTTPS request being sent. The attack involves a victim client trying to resume a TLS connection and an attacker redirecting the packets to a different address or port than that intended by the client. The attacker must already have been configured by the administrator of h2o to act as a backend to one of the addresses or ports that the h2o instance listens to. Session IDs and tickets generated by h2o are not bound to information specific to the server address, port, or the X.509 certificate, and therefore it is possible for an attacker to force the victim connection to wrongfully resume against a different server address or port on which the same h2o instance is listening. Once a TLS session is misdirected to resume to a server address / port that is configured to use an attacker-controlled server as the backend, depending on the configuration, HTTPS requests from the victim client may be forwarded to the attacker's server. An H2O instance is vulnerable to this attack only if the instance is configured to listen to different addresses or ports using the listen directive at the host level and the instance is configured to connect to backend servers managed by multiple entities. A patch is available at commit 35760540337a47e5150da0f4a66a609fad2ef0ab. As a workaround, one may stop using using host-level listen directives in favor of global-level ones. | ||||
| CVE-2023-41037 | 1 Openpgpjs | 1 Openpgpjs | 2024-11-21 | 4.3 Medium |
| OpenPGP.js is a JavaScript implementation of the OpenPGP protocol. In affected versions OpenPGP Cleartext Signed Messages are cryptographically signed messages where the signed text is readable without special tools. These messages typically contain a "Hash: ..." header declaring the hash algorithm used to compute the signature digest. OpenPGP.js up to v5.9.0 ignored any data preceding the "Hash: ..." texts when verifying the signature. As a result, malicious parties could add arbitrary text to a third-party Cleartext Signed Message, to lead the victim to believe that the arbitrary text was signed. A user or application is vulnerable to said attack vector if it verifies the CleartextMessage by only checking the returned `verified` property, discarding the associated `data` information, and instead _visually trusting_ the contents of the original message. Since `verificationResult.data` would always contain the actual signed data, users and apps that check this information are not vulnerable. Similarly, given a CleartextMessage object, retrieving the data using `getText()` or the `text` field returns only the contents that are considered when verifying the signature. Finally, re-armoring a CleartextMessage object (using `armor()` will also result in a "sanitised" version, with the extraneous text being removed. This issue has been addressed in version 5.10.1 (current stable version) which will reject messages when calling `openpgp.readCleartextMessage()` and in version 4.10.11 (legacy version) which will will reject messages when calling `openpgp.cleartext.readArmored()`. Users are advised to upgrade. Users unable to upgrade should check the contents of `verificationResult.data` to see what data was actually signed, rather than visually trusting the contents of the armored message. | ||||
| CVE-2023-40178 | 2 Node-saml, Node Saml Project | 2 Node-saml, Node Saml | 2024-11-21 | 5.3 Medium |
| Node-SAML is a SAML library not dependent on any frameworks that runs in Node. The lack of checking of current timestamp allows a LogoutRequest XML to be reused multiple times even when the current time is past the NotOnOrAfter. This could impact the user where they would be logged out from an expired LogoutRequest. In bigger contexts, if LogoutRequests are sent out in mass to different SPs, this could impact many users on a large scale. This issue was patched in version 4.0.5. | ||||
| CVE-2023-40012 | 1 Trailofbits | 1 Uthenticode | 2024-11-21 | 5.9 Medium |
| uthenticode is a small cross-platform library for partially verifying Authenticode digital signatures. Versions of uthenticode prior to the 2.x series did not check Extended Key Usages in certificates, in violation of the Authenticode X.509 certificate profile. As a result, a malicious user could produce a "signed" PE file that uthenticode would verify and consider valid using an X.509 certificate that isn't entitled to produce code signatures (e.g., a SSL certificate). By design, uthenticode does not perform full-chain validation. However, the absence of EKU validation was an unintended oversight. The 2.0.0 release series includes EKU checks. There are no workarounds to this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2023-39969 | 1 Trailofbits | 1 Uthenticode | 2024-11-21 | 9.1 Critical |
| uthenticode is a small cross-platform library for partially verifying Authenticode digital signatures. Version 1.0.9 of uthenticode hashed the entire file rather than hashing sections by virtual address, in violation of the Authenticode specification. As a result, an attacker could modify code within a binary without changing its Authenticode hash, making it appear valid from uthenticode's perspective. Versions of uthenticode prior to 1.0.9 are not vulnerable to this attack, nor are versions in the 2.x series. By design, uthenticode does not perform full-chain validation. However, the malleability of signature verification introduced in 1.0.9 was an unintended oversight. The 2.x series addresses the vulnerability. Versions prior to 1.0.9 are also not vulnerable, but users are encouraged to upgrade rather than downgrade. There are no workarounds to this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2023-39393 | 1 Huawei | 2 Emui, Harmonyos | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Vulnerability of insecure signatures in the ServiceWifiResources module. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause ServiceWifiResources to be maliciously modified and overwritten. | ||||
| CVE-2023-39392 | 1 Huawei | 2 Emui, Harmonyos | 2024-11-21 | 7.5 High |
| Vulnerability of insecure signatures in the OsuLogin module. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause OsuLogin to be maliciously modified and overwritten. | ||||
| CVE-2023-39211 | 1 Zoom | 2 Rooms, Zoom | 2024-11-21 | 8.8 High |
| Improper privilege management in Zoom Desktop Client for Windows and Zoom Rooms for Windows before 5.15.5 may allow an authenticated user to enable an information disclosure via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2023-38418 | 1 F5 | 2 Access Policy Manager Clients, Big-ip Access Policy Manager | 2024-11-21 | 7.8 High |
| The BIG-IP Edge Client Installer on macOS does not follow best practices for elevating privileges during the installation process. Note: Software versions which have reached End of Technical Support (EoTS) are not evaluated. | ||||
| CVE-2023-34435 | 2 Level1, Realtek | 3 Wbr-6013, Wbr-6013 Firmware, Rtl819x Jungle Software Development Kit | 2024-11-21 | 7.2 High |
| A firmware update vulnerability exists in the boa formUpload functionality of Realtek rtl819x Jungle SDK v3.4.11. A specially crafted network packets can lead to arbitrary firmware update. An attacker can provide a malicious file to trigger this vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2023-33959 | 1 Notaryproject | 1 Notation-go | 2024-11-21 | 8.4 High |
| notation is a CLI tool to sign and verify OCI artifacts and container images. An attacker who has compromised a registry can cause users to verify the wrong artifact. The problem has been fixed in the release v1.0.0-rc.6. Users should upgrade their notation-go library to v1.0.0-rc.6 or above. Users unable to upgrade may restrict container registries to a set of secure and trusted container registries. | ||||
| CVE-2023-33768 | 1 Belkin | 2 Wemo Smart Plug Wsp080, Wemo Smart Plug Wsp080 Firmware | 2024-11-21 | 6.5 Medium |
| Incorrect signature verification of the firmware during the Device Firmware Update process of Belkin Wemo Smart Plug WSP080 v1.2 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted firmware file. | ||||