Total
73 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-1000385 | 3 Debian, Erlang, Redhat | 4 Debian Linux, Erlang\/otp, Cloudforms Managementengine and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Erlang otp TLS server answers with different TLS alerts to different error types in the RSA PKCS #1 1.5 padding. This allows an attacker to decrypt content or sign messages with the server's private key (this is a variation of the Bleichenbacher attack). | ||||
| CVE-2017-7480 | 1 Rootkit Hunter Project | 1 Rootkit Hunter | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| rkhunter versions before 1.4.4 are vulnerable to file download over insecure channel when doing mirror update resulting into potential remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2017-12735 | 1 Siemens | 2 Logo\!, Logo\! 8 Bm Firmware | 2025-04-20 | 7.4 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in LOGO! 8 BM (incl. SIPLUS variants) (All versions < V8.3). An attacker who performs a Man-in-the-Middle attack between the LOGO! BM and other devices could potentially decrypt and modify network traffic. | ||||
| CVE-2017-15086 | 1 Redhat | 3 Enterprise Linux, Gluster Storage, Storage | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| It was discovered that the fix for CVE-2017-12151 was not properly shipped in erratum RHSA-2017:2858 for Red Hat Gluster Storage 3.3 for RHEL 6. | ||||
| CVE-2017-15042 | 2 Golang, Redhat | 3 Go, Devtools, Enterprise Linux | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| An unintended cleartext issue exists in Go before 1.8.4 and 1.9.x before 1.9.1. RFC 4954 requires that, during SMTP, the PLAIN auth scheme must only be used on network connections secured with TLS. The original implementation of smtp.PlainAuth in Go 1.0 enforced this requirement, and it was documented to do so. In 2013, upstream issue #5184, this was changed so that the server may decide whether PLAIN is acceptable. The result is that if you set up a man-in-the-middle SMTP server that doesn't advertise STARTTLS and does advertise that PLAIN auth is OK, the smtp.PlainAuth implementation sends the username and password. | ||||
| CVE-2017-13098 | 1 Bouncycastle | 1 Legion-of-the-bouncy-castle-java-crytography-api | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| BouncyCastle TLS prior to version 1.0.3, when configured to use the JCE (Java Cryptography Extension) for cryptographic functions, provides a weak Bleichenbacher oracle when any TLS cipher suite using RSA key exchange is negotiated. An attacker can recover the private key from a vulnerable application. This vulnerability is referred to as "ROBOT." | ||||
| CVE-2017-15085 | 1 Redhat | 3 Enterprise Linux, Gluster Storage, Storage | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| It was discovered that the fix for CVE-2017-12150 was not properly shipped in erratum RHSA-2017:2858 for Red Hat Gluster Storage 3.3 for RHEL 6. | ||||
| CVE-2017-10789 | 1 Dbd-mysql Project | 1 Dbd-mysql | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The DBD::mysql module through 4.043 for Perl uses the mysql_ssl=1 setting to mean that SSL is optional (even though this setting's documentation has a "your communication with the server will be encrypted" statement), which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers via a cleartext-downgrade attack, a related issue to CVE-2015-3152. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6870 | 1 Siemens | 1 Simatic Wincc Sm\@rtclient | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A vulnerability was discovered in Siemens SIMATIC WinCC Sm@rtClient for Android (All versions before V1.0.2.2). The existing TLS protocol implementation could allow an attacker to read and modify data within a TLS session while performing a Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attack. | ||||
| CVE-2017-9941 | 1 Siemens | 1 Sipass Integrated | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A vulnerability was discovered in Siemens SiPass integrated (All versions before V2.70) that could allow an attacker in a Man-in-the-Middle position between the SiPass integrated server and SiPass integrated clients to read or modify the network communication. | ||||
| CVE-2017-6052 | 1 Hyundaiusa | 1 Blue Link | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| A Man-in-the-Middle issue was discovered in Hyundai Motor America Blue Link 3.9.5 and 3.9.4. Communication channel endpoints are not verified, which may allow a remote attacker to access or influence communications between the identified endpoints. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2112 | 3 Canonical, Redhat, Samba | 7 Ubuntu Linux, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus and 4 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The bundled LDAP client library in Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 does not recognize the "client ldap sasl wrapping" setting, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to perform LDAP protocol-downgrade attacks by modifying the client-server data stream. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2110 | 3 Canonical, Redhat, Samba | 8 Ubuntu Linux, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus and 5 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The NTLMSSP authentication implementation in Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 allows man-in-the-middle attackers to perform protocol-downgrade attacks by modifying the client-server data stream to remove application-layer flags or encryption settings, as demonstrated by clearing the NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SEAL or NTLMSSP_NEGOTIATE_SIGN option to disrupt LDAP security. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2114 | 3 Canonical, Redhat, Samba | 7 Ubuntu Linux, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus and 4 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The SMB1 protocol implementation in Samba 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 does not recognize the "server signing = mandatory" setting, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SMB servers by modifying the client-server data stream. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2118 | 4 Canonical, Debian, Redhat and 1 more | 9 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Enterprise Linux and 6 more | 2025-04-12 | 7.5 High |
| The MS-SAMR and MS-LSAD protocol implementations in Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 mishandle DCERPC connections, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to perform protocol-downgrade attacks and impersonate users by modifying the client-server data stream, aka "BADLOCK." | ||||
| CVE-2014-5277 | 1 Docker | 2 Docker, Docker-py | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Docker before 1.3.1 and docker-py before 0.5.3 fall back to HTTP when the HTTPS connection to the registry fails, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct downgrade attacks and obtain authentication and image data by leveraging a network position between the client and the registry to block HTTPS traffic. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2115 | 3 Canonical, Redhat, Samba | 7 Ubuntu Linux, Enterprise Linux, Rhel Aus and 4 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Samba 3.x and 4.x before 4.2.11, 4.3.x before 4.3.8, and 4.4.x before 4.4.2 does not require SMB signing within a DCERPC session over ncacn_np, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SMB clients by modifying the client-server data stream. | ||||
| CVE-2015-1843 | 1 Redhat | 2 Docker, Rhel Extras Other | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The Red Hat docker package before 1.5.0-28, when using the --add-registry option, falls back to HTTP when the HTTPS connection to the registry fails, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to conduct downgrade attacks and obtain authentication and image data by leveraging a network position between the client and the registry to block HTTPS traffic. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of a CVE-2014-5277 regression. | ||||
| CVE-2013-6434 | 1 Redhat | 2 Enterprise Virtualization Manager, Rhev Manager | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The remote-viewer in Red Hat Enterprise Virtualization Manager (RHEV-M) before 3.3, when using a native SPICE client invocation method, initially makes insecure connections to the SPICE server, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof the SPICE server. | ||||
| CVE-2009-3555 | 9 Apache, Canonical, Debian and 6 more | 15 Http Server, Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux and 12 more | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| The TLS protocol, and the SSL protocol 3.0 and possibly earlier, as used in Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS) 7.0, mod_ssl in the Apache HTTP Server 2.2.14 and earlier, OpenSSL before 0.9.8l, GnuTLS 2.8.5 and earlier, Mozilla Network Security Services (NSS) 3.12.4 and earlier, multiple Cisco products, and other products, does not properly associate renegotiation handshakes with an existing connection, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to insert data into HTTPS sessions, and possibly other types of sessions protected by TLS or SSL, by sending an unauthenticated request that is processed retroactively by a server in a post-renegotiation context, related to a "plaintext injection" attack, aka the "Project Mogul" issue. | ||||