Filtered by vendor Fortinet
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Forticlient
Subscriptions
Total
68 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2015-4077 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The (1) mdare64_48.sys, (2) mdare32_48.sys, (3) mdare32_52.sys, and (4) mdare64_52.sys drivers in Fortinet FortiClient before 5.2.4 allow local users to read arbitrary kernel memory via a 0x22608C ioctl call. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5735 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The (1) mdare64_48.sys, (2) mdare32_48.sys, (3) mdare32_52.sys, and (4) mdare64_52.sys drivers in Fortinet FortiClient before 5.2.4 allow local users to write to arbitrary memory locations via a 0x226108 ioctl call. | ||||
| CVE-2015-1453 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The qm class in Fortinet FortiClient 5.2.3.091 for Android uses a hardcoded encryption key of FoRtInEt!AnDrOiD, which makes it easier for attackers to obtain passwords and possibly other sensitive data by leveraging the key to decrypt data in the Shared Preferences. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5737 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The (1) mdare64_48.sys, (2) mdare32_48.sys, (3) mdare32_52.sys, (4) mdare64_52.sys, and (5) Fortishield.sys drivers in Fortinet FortiClient before 5.2.4 do not properly restrict access to the API for management of processes and the Windows registry, which allows local users to obtain a privileged handle to a PID and possibly have unspecified other impact, as demonstrated by a 0x2220c8 ioctl call. | ||||
| CVE-2015-7362 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Fortinet FortiClient Linux SSLVPN before build 2313, when installed on Linux in a home directory that is world readable and executable, allows local users to gain privileges via the helper/subroc setuid program. | ||||
| CVE-2015-1569 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Fortinet FortiClient 5.2.028 for iOS does not validate certificates, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof SSL VPN servers via a crafted certificate. | ||||
| CVE-2015-1570 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The Endpoint Control protocol implementation in Fortinet FortiClient 5.2.3.091 for Android and 5.2.028 for iOS does not validate certificates, which makes it easier for man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers via a crafted certificate. | ||||
| CVE-2015-5736 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| The Fortishield.sys driver in Fortinet FortiClient before 5.2.4 allows local users to execute arbitrary code with kernel privileges by setting the callback function in a (1) 0x220024 or (2) 0x220028 ioctl call. | ||||
| CVE-2013-4669 | 5 Apple, Fortinet, Google and 2 more | 7 Mac Os X, Forticlient, Forticlient Lite and 4 more | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| FortiClient before 4.3.5.472 on Windows, before 4.0.3.134 on Mac OS X, and before 4.0 on Android; FortiClient Lite before 4.3.4.461 on Windows; FortiClient Lite 2.0 through 2.0.0223 on Android; and FortiClient SSL VPN before 4.0.2258 on Linux proceed with an SSL session after determining that the server's X.509 certificate is invalid, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to obtain sensitive information by leveraging a password transmission that occurs before the user warning about the certificate problem. | ||||
| CVE-2009-1262 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2025-04-09 | N/A |
| Format string vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClient 3.0.614, and possibly earlier, allows local users to execute arbitrary code via format string specifiers in the VPN connection name. | ||||
| CVE-2005-4570 | 1 Fortinet | 3 Forticlient, Fortimanager, Fortios | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| The Internet Key Exchange version 1 (IKEv1) implementations in Fortinet FortiOS 2.50, 2.80 and 3.0, FortiClient 2.0,; and FortiManager 2.80 and 3.0 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (termination of a process that is automatically restarted) via IKE packets with invalid values of certain IPSec attributes, as demonstrated by the PROTOS ISAKMP Test Suite for IKEv1. NOTE: due to the lack of details in the vendor advisory, it is unclear which of CVE-2005-3666, CVE-2005-3667, and/or CVE-2005-3668 this issue applies to. | ||||
| CVE-2018-9193 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2025-03-24 | 7.1 High |
| A researcher has disclosed several vulnerabilities against FortiClient for Windows version 6.0.5 and below, version 5.6.6, the combination of these vulnerabilities can turn into an exploit chain, which allows a user to gain system privileges on Microsoft Windows. | ||||
| CVE-2024-50564 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2025-02-03 | 3.2 Low |
| A use of hard-coded cryptographic key in Fortinet FortiClientWindows version 7.4.0, 7.2.x all versions, 7.0.x all versions, and 6.4.x all versions may allow a low-privileged user to decrypt interprocess communication via monitoring named piped. | ||||
| CVE-2024-31492 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2025-01-23 | 7.8 High |
| An external control of file name or path vulnerability [CWE-73] in FortiClientMac version 7.2.3 and below, version 7.0.10 and below installer may allow a local attacker to execute arbitrary code or commands via writing a malicious configuration file in /tmp before starting the installation process. | ||||
| CVE-2024-47574 | 1 Fortinet | 2 Forticlient, Forticlientwindows | 2025-01-21 | 7.4 High |
| A authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Fortinet FortiClientWindows version 7.4.0, versions 7.2.4 through 7.2.0, versions 7.0.12 through 7.0.0, and 6.4.10 through 6.4.0 allows low privilege attacker to execute arbitrary code with high privilege via spoofed named pipe messages. | ||||
| CVE-2020-15934 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2025-01-21 | 8.6 High |
| An execution with unnecessary privileges vulnerability in the VCM engine of FortiClient for Linux versions 6.2.7 and below, version 6.4.0. may allow local users to elevate their privileges to root by creating a malicious script or program on the target machine. | ||||
| CVE-2023-45590 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2025-01-17 | 9.4 Critical |
| An improper control of generation of code ('code injection') in Fortinet FortiClientLinux version 7.2.0, 7.0.6 through 7.0.10 and 7.0.3 through 7.0.4 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via tricking a FortiClientLinux user into visiting a malicious website | ||||
| CVE-2024-3661 | 10 Apple, Cisco, Citrix and 7 more | 13 Iphone Os, Macos, Anyconnect Vpn Client and 10 more | 2025-01-15 | 7.6 High |
| DHCP can add routes to a client’s routing table via the classless static route option (121). VPN-based security solutions that rely on routes to redirect traffic can be forced to leak traffic over the physical interface. An attacker on the same local network can read, disrupt, or possibly modify network traffic that was expected to be protected by the VPN. | ||||
| CVE-2023-41840 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2024-11-21 | 7.4 High |
| A untrusted search path vulnerability in Fortinet FortiClientWindows 7.0.9 allows an attacker to perform a DLL Hijack attack via a malicious OpenSSL engine library in the search path. | ||||
| CVE-2023-37939 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Forticlient | 2024-11-21 | 3 Low |
| An exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor vulnerability [CWE-200] in FortiClient for Windows 7.2.0, 7.0 all versions, 6.4 all versions, 6.2 all versions, Linux 7.2.0, 7.0 all versions, 6.4 all versions, 6.2 all versions and Mac 7.2.0 through 7.2.1, 7.0 all versions, 6.4 all versions, 6.2 all versions, may allow a local authenticated attacker with no Administrative privileges to retrieve the list of files or folders excluded from malware scanning. | ||||